在政治危机之后,群体团结推动了社交媒体的参与
Malia Marks1, Yara Kyrychenko1, Johan Gärdebo2
1Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
概括
在政治危机期间, 积极的社会情绪, 这项研究突显了在重大事件发生后在网络政治话语中群体内联系的关键作用.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学
- 政治沟通
- 计算社会科学
背景情况:
- 社交媒体往往通过群体间的敌意增加了两极分化.
- 积极的社会情绪,如群体团结,也可以显著地影响在线参与,特别是在危机期间.
研究的目的:
- 调查2024年美国总统竞选期间群体威胁后社交媒体参与的社会情绪驱动因素.
- 比较内部团结与外部团结的预测力,
主要方法:
- 一项预先注册的研究分析了来自美国484个党派账户的62118条社交媒体帖子.
- 检查了重大政治事件之前和之后的参与模式:特朗普暗杀企图和拜登2024年7月的竞选暂停.
- 使用定量分析将情绪驱动因素与用户参与度进行关联.
主要成果:
- 外部群体的敌意通常预示着参与,但内部群体的团结在共和党人枪击后和民主党人撤军后显著增加.
- 在这些特定的危机时期,积极的群体内情绪在推动参与度方面发挥了更为主导作用.
- 这些发现挑战了消极情绪总是病毒性内容的主要驱动因素的观点.
结论:
- 群体内团结是社交媒体参与的强大驱动力,
- 在政治危机中,积极的情绪可能比对方群体的敌意更有影响.
- 了解这些社会情感动态对于理解在线政治行为和两极分化至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.7K
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
13.9K
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
35.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.4K
In- and Out-Groups
39.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.9K
Social Proof
28.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
28.5K
Robbers Cave
14.4K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.4K
Social Exchange Theory
35.4K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
35.4K
Social Traps
23.2K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
23.2K
