慢性疼痛假的差异性安慰剂效应:随机对照试验的网络元分析
Renhong Wan1, Qianhua Zheng1, Xiaorui Zeng1
1Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
BMC complementary medicine and therapies
|September 1, 2025
概括
假针具有显著的安慰剂效应, 这项研究为慢性疼痛临床试验中选择安慰剂对照提供了指导,尽管需要更多的直接比较.
科学领域:
- 整合和补充医学
- 疼痛管理研究
- 临床试验方法
背景情况:
- 针的临床效果经常被低估,
- 有多种假针方法,但缺乏对比试验使选择最佳安慰剂对照方法变得复杂.
- 这一系统性审查解决了对假干预的基于证据的指导的需要.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较各种假干预的不同安慰剂效应.
- 为在临床实践和研究中选择最佳安慰剂对照提供基于证据的指导.
- 为未来针研究中随机对照试验 (RCT) 的设计提供信息.
主要方法:
- 在PubMed,Embase,Cochrane和Web of Science系统搜索与慢性非癌症疼痛中针与假针进行比较的RCT.
- 使用频率主义随机效应模型进行间接治疗比较的元分析.
- 使用网络元分析 (CINeMA) 的证据水平评估.
主要成果:
- 分析了45项涉及8287名参与者的RCT和7种假针方法.
- 与手动针相比,等待治疗组的疼痛变化差异最为明显.
- 与其他方法相比,无透假针 (针点或非针点) 显示出较低的安慰剂效应,并具有相似的不良事件率和成功失明.
结论:
- 假针具有显著的安慰剂效应,而无透技术的影响最小.
- 这些发现为针研究中选择安慰剂对照提供了指导.
- 进一步的对比试验是产生假针疗效的直接比较证据的必要条件.
相关概念视频
The Placebo Effect
6.3K
The placebo effect occurs when people's expectations or beliefs influence or determine their experience in a given situation. In other words, simply expecting something to happen can actually make it happen.
6.3K
Blind Procedures
12.1K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.1K


