Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Disparities in the uptake of learning disability (intellectual disability) annual health checks.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

Watch Me Play!: results of a feasibility study of a remotely delivered intervention to promote mental health resilience for children (age 0-8 years) across UK early years and children's services.

BJPsych open·2026
Same author

Initial Testing of a Novel, Mental Imagery-Based Anxiety Intervention for People With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities Using a Single Case Experimental Design.

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID·2026
Same author

Mother-Child Closeness Trajectories in Families of Children With Intellectual Disabilities From a UK Cohort Study.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2026
Same author

Adaptation of behavioural activation for adolescents with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities and depression.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same author

Maximising the public health benefits of smokefree prisons: a synopsis from a mixed-methods study.

Public health research (Southampton, England)·2026
Same journal

Case Report: Subacute combined degeneration misdiagnosed as a primary affective disorder: diagnostic pitfalls and clinical red flags.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Virtual reality based attentional bias modification training for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a feasibility study.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Job demands and resources in relation to burnout and educational coexistence among Chilean education workers.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Correction: Sleep characteristics and cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: age-specific associations.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Systematic review of animal studies on the use of herbal medicine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Alcohol and cannabis use severity in relation to compulsive sexual behavior and problematic pornography use in a non-clinical sample: a cross-sectional study.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K

对发育行为检查清单 - 主报告进行最低临床重要差异估计

Daniel L Sutherland1, Emma L Taylor1,2, Kylie M Gray2,3

  • 1Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

Frontiers in psychiatry
|September 2, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究估计了发育行为检查清单 (DBC-P) 的最小临床重要差异. 这些发现为解释智力障碍儿童行为和情感问题的变化提供了基准.

关键词:
发展行为检查清单 (DBC)自闭症智力障碍进行元分析最小临床重要差异 (MCID)

更多相关视频

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

9.3K

科学领域:

  • 儿童和青少年精神病学
  • 发展心理学
  • 智力障碍研究

背景情况:

  • 评估干预的有效性需要了解有意义的结果变化.
  • 发展行为检查清单,家长报告 (DBC-P) 测量智力障碍儿童和青少年的行为和情绪问题.

研究的目的:

  • 估计DBC-P的临床重要差异 (MCID).
  • 为解释DBC-P得分变化提供基准.

主要方法:

  • 基于分布的估计来源于使用DBC- P的21项干预评估的元分析.
  • 从10名家长和21名专业人士获得了基于的估计结果.

主要成果:

  • 在RCT中,平均DBC总原始得分降低了3. 01- 4. 73,而在前后设计中则降低了9. 16.
  • 父母照顾者报告的MCID中位数为6 (IQR 4-7),而专业人士报告的MCID中位数为8 (IQR 5-14).

结论:

  • 结果将DBC-P得分相对于其他干预措施和利益相关者的观点的变化置于背景中.
  • 选择MCID值取决于特定干预的优先考虑因素.