美国成年人的居住隔离和久坐行为
Mohammad Moniruzzaman1, Yangyang Deng2, Breanna Rogers2
1Socio-Spatial Determinants of Health (SSDH) Laboratory, Population and Community Health Sciences Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. mohammad.moniruzzaman@nih.gov.
Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors
|September 2, 2025
概括
这项研究没有发现非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔成年人的居住隔离与久坐行为之间的联系. 不论性别,静坐时间都没有差异.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生
- 社会环境健康
- 流行病学
背景情况:
- 过度久坐是美国的一个重大公共卫生问题.
- 从社会生态角度来看,住宅隔离对SB的影响仍未得到充分研究.
- 了解这些环境因素对于制定有针对性的干预措施至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查县级住宅隔离与每日总静坐时间之间的关系.
- 在全美成年人样本中检查这些关系,特别关注非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人口.
- 探索隔离与SB之间的潜在性别差异.
主要方法:
- 来自AmeriSpeak小组的2,637名美国成年人 (20至75岁) 的横截面分析 (2019年).
- 使用验证的24小时内完成活动 (ACT24) 追忆测量静坐时间.
- 使用非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔成年人的县级隔离指数量化居住隔离;回归模型根据共变量调整并按性别分层.
主要成果:
- 美国成年人报告平均每天坐着时间为9.5小时.
- 在非西班牙裔黑人住宅隔离和久坐时间之间没有发现显著的关联 (p=0. 790).
- 在西班牙裔居住隔离和久坐时间之间没有发现显著的关联 (p=0.743);性别分层分析也产生了零结果.
结论:
- 这项研究没有发现非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔成年人的居住隔离与久坐行为之间的联系.
- 这些关联在性别上没有显著差异.
- 建议以后对更大的样本进行研究,特别是来自代表性不足的少数群体的样本,以确认这些发现.
相关概念视频
Cross-Sectional Research
11.8K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.8K
Surveys
15.3K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
15.3K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
91.4K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
91.4K
Relationship Formation
41.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
671
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
671
Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K


