Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison01:09

Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison

5.7K
Skeletal muscle relaxants can target the central nervous system [CNS] to reduce muscle tension or act directly at the neuromuscular junction to induce temporary paralysis. These two classes of muscle relaxants are called centrally acting muscle relaxants and peripherally acting muscle relaxants. They differ in their action, mechanism, administration route, and clinical uses.
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic...
5.7K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

An Analysis of Characteristics Associated With Bilateral Versus Unilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A National Database Analysis.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Divided care, diminished outcomes? The impact of care fragmentation on survival in glioblastoma.

Journal of neuro-oncology·2026
Same author

Surgical Intervention in Very Elderly Patients with Spinal Ependymoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Insurance Type as an Independent Factor of Surgical Delay After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Applying Lean principles to pediatric neurosurgery: quantifying residents' perception of complexity of common procedures and concomitant effect on operating room efficiency.

Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics·2026
Same author

Surgical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Foraminotomy for C8 Radiculopathies With Motor Deficits: A Dynamometer-Based Study.

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 7, 2026

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation
10:09

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation

Published on: October 14, 2022

4.0K

仅靠腰部减压可以缓解背痛吗?

David J Mazur-Hart1, Christian G Lopez Ramos1, Joseph G Nugent1

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery.

Clinical spine surgery
|September 3, 2025
PubMed
概括

大多数腰椎狭窄症患者经过减压手术后的腰椎疼痛有所改善. 较高的手术前疼痛和残疾预测了更好的结果,这表明LBP不是LSS减压的禁忌.

关键词:
背部疼痛压缩减压腰部脊柱一个名字脊柱狭窄症脊椎手术

更多相关视频

Full-Endoscopic Isolation Zone Technique for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
05:42

Full-Endoscopic Isolation Zone Technique for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Published on: April 7, 2023

837
Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
05:17

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Published on: February 9, 2024

754

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation
10:09

Transtubular Endoscopic Posterolateral Decompression for L5-S1 Lumbar Lateral Disc Herniation

Published on: October 14, 2022

4.0K
Full-Endoscopic Isolation Zone Technique for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation
05:42

Full-Endoscopic Isolation Zone Technique for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Published on: April 7, 2023

837
Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
05:17

Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Published on: February 9, 2024

754

科学领域:

  • 神经外科
  • 整形医学
  • 脊椎手术

背景情况:

  • 腰部疼痛是脊椎退行性疾病的一个常见症状.
  • 腰痛通常被认为是脊柱减压手术的禁忌.
  • 患有腰椎狭窄症 (LSS) 且因神经性关节损伤或根部病变而进行减压的患者有时会报告下腰椎损伤的改善.

研究的目的:

  • 为了确定LSS减压手术后的LBP是否有所改善.
  • 使用LASSO方法识别手术前腰痛改善的预测因素.
  • 为临床指导和患者预期制定试点名录.

主要方法:

  • 在176名患者中进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者接受了没有融合的压缩手术 (2017-2020年).
  • 排除标准包括瘤,感染,先前的融合或不完整的问卷.
  • 分析患者报告的结果测量 (PROM),临床和放射变量;比较患者在12个月内达到最低临床重要差异 (MCID) 和没有达到LBP的患者.
  • 用于预测变量识别的最小绝对缩小和选择运算符 (LASSO) 方法.

主要成果:

  • 在12个月内,61. 9%的患者 (n=109) 实现了背部疼痛的MCID.
  • 在背部疼痛改善的患者在手术前的疼痛和残疾分数显著增加.
  • 机器学习确定了年龄,BMI,VAS-B,ODI,EQ-5D,PROMIS-P,PROMIS-M和CCI作为改善的预测指标 (AUROC=0.832).

结论:

  • 大多数患者在LSS减压后经历了显著的LBP改善.
  • 术前增加的疼痛和残疾与减压后更好的LBP结果有关.
  • 没有融合的LBP不应该是减压的禁忌;预测性名录可以帮助进行手术前咨询.