Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

365
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
365
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

586
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
586
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

4.1K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
4.1K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.1K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.1K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

409
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
409
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient01:10

Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient

4.5K
In a linear calibration curve, there is a value called the calibration coefficient, denoted by 'r,' which measures the strength and the direction of association between two variables. The correlation coefficient value ranges from −1 to +1. A value of +1 indicates a perfect positive linear correlation, −1 denotes a perfect negative correlation, and 0 implies no correlation between the two variables. A positive correlation value establishes that as one variable increases, the...
4.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same author

Analyzing multiple mediators in multiple single-mediator models leads to wrong conclusions.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Investigating lived ostracism: valid causal inference requires articulating the causal estimand.

The Journal of social psychology·2025
Same author

Upscaling behavioral interventions requires addressing selection bias.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Rethinking causal inference for recurring exposures: The incremental propensity score approach with lavaan.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Causal Inference with Unobserved Confounding: Leveraging Negative Control Outcomes Using Lavaan.

Multivariate behavioral research·2025
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.7K

双重可靠的控制结果校准方法 估计条件效应与不受控制的混.

Wen Wei Loh1

  • 1From the Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|September 8, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究引入了一种新方法,即双重可靠的对照结果校准 (COCA),用于从观测数据中估计因果关系. 它允许对不偏见的因果效应估计,即使在不受控制的混的情况下,也可以改进现有方法.

关键词:
造成混或隐藏偏见的偏见.负控制结果的负控制结果.强烈的无视性假设.没有测量或观察到的混.

更多相关视频

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

科学领域:

  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 因果推理因果推理

背景情况:

  • 从非随机研究中得出因果结论需要对未测量的混做出假设,这些假设往往是无法测试的.
  • 现有的控制结果校准 (COCA) 方法依赖于正确建模负控制结果.

研究的目的:

  • 为平均因果效应提出一个两倍可靠的COCA估计器.
  • 放松现有的COCA方法的严格建模要求.
  • 为了允许通过共变量-暴露相互作用来修改效果.

主要方法:

  • 开发了一种使用正确指定的暴露和焦点结果模型的双倍强大的COCA估计器.
  • 这种方法可以防止来自错误指定的负控结果模型的偏差.
  • 嵌入的共变量-暴露相互作用术语,以实现效果修改分析.

主要成果:

  • 两倍强大的COCA估计器提供了不偏见的点估计和推断.
  • 模拟研究证实了该方法能够获得不偏见的估计.
  • 对志愿者和心理健康数据的实证评估证明了其实际效用.

结论:

  • 拟议的双重可靠的COCA方法为因果推理提供了一种实用和可实施的方法.
  • 它允许在存在不受控制的混的情况下对平均因果效应进行无偏见的估计.
  • 这一进步提高了从观察性研究中得出的因果结论的可靠性.