在道德上具有攻击性的科学发现激活了认知性骗局
Cory J Clark1, Nicholas Kerry1, Maja Graso2
1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|September 10, 2025
概括
人们使用认知技巧来拒绝他们认为道德上令人反感的科学发现. 这些信仰系统防御,包括动机混乱和后现代主义,即使证据是矛盾的,也会阻止更新信仰.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 有动机的认知影响信仰的形成和维护.
- 个人可能会使用认知策略来保护现有的信念系统免受矛盾信息的影响.
研究的目的:
- 调查信念体系防御,将"道德上错误"的科学主张转化为"经验上错误"的主张.
- 识别用于驳回不必要的科学发现的特定认知策略.
主要方法:
- 进行了五项涉及7040名参与者的实验.
- 参与者评估了相同的科学摘要,其社会道德可取性各不相同.
- 收集关于蔑视策略的数据,包括动机混乱和动机后现代主义.
主要成果:
- 在道德上受伤害的参与者更有可能将索赔视为不可理解或否认其经验地位.
- 参与者支持策略中和扰乱知识,如批评样本大小和研究人员情报.
- 用一种相互矛盾的投诉组合来拒绝发现,称为"信念系统过度杀戮".
结论:
- 有动机的认知使用"认知诡计"来捍卫信念系统免受不受欢迎的科学发现.
- 这些信仰系统防御的作用是尽量减少对信仰更新的需要.
- 这些策略的部署可能会破坏对知识的客观追求.
更多相关视频
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
679
10:09Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
Published on: September 22, 2014
13.6K
相关概念视频
Cognitive Dissonance
36.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.8K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
7.2K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
7.2K
Ethics in Research
25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
The Scientific Method
64.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.8K
The Scientific Method
258.8K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
258.8K
The Scientific Method
65.0K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
65.0K
