在拉丁裔移民中解决亲密伴侣暴力问题的干预措施的获取领域:系统审查议定书
Erika La Frano1, Jamie Conklin2, Moses Okumu1
1School of Social Work, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, CA, United States.
JMIR research protocols
|September 11, 2025
概括
本系统性审查审查了拉丁裔移民的亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 干预措施,重点关注计划如何解决进入障碍并提高有效性. 结果将指导未来的研究和实践,以获得公平的支持.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
- 移民研究 移民研究
背景情况:
- 由于语言,文化,法律,社会和财务因素,拉丁裔移民在获得亲密伴侣暴力 (IPV) 支持方面面临重大障碍.
- 现有的IPV干预措施可能无法充分解决这些特定的访问障碍或针对相关的风险和保护因素.
研究的目的:
- 确定旨在减少拉美移民中IPV结果的干预研究.
- 评估这些干预措施如何与获得护理的框架保持一致.
- 确定与护理准入框架的调整是否会影响干预的有效性.
主要方法:
- 使用PRISMA-P指南进行系统审查,搜索7个数据库.
- 标题,摘要和全文的独立双重审核,第三审核员的决议.
- 开发一个定制的表格来提取干预特征,并使用新的评级表格对护理准入框架的运行.
主要成果:
- 总共有943个参考文献被确定,其中182个被选中进行全文审查.
- 数据提取和质量评估正在进行中.
- 预计研究结果将于2025年10月公布.
结论:
- 这次审查将综合解决针对拉丁裔移民的IPV干预措施进入障碍的策略.
- 调查结果将为未来的实践和研究提供信息,以加强对支持和资源的公平获取.
- 这项研究旨在通过更好地与拉丁裔移民群体的需求相协调,提高IPV干预措施的有效性.
相关概念视频
Community Based Intervention
281
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
281
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.3K
Surveys
16.6K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.6K
Cross-Sectional Research
12.4K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.4K
Relationship Formation
45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Longitudinal Research
13.1K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
13.1K


