脑间同步缓解了回声室内的极端主义
Aial Sobeh1, Tomer Marcos Vakrat1, Simone Shamay-Tsoory1,2
1Social and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|September 12, 2025
概括
在志同道合的团体中进行讨论可以增加极端主义. 然而,执行控制区域的同步大脑活动,特别是背侧前额叶皮质 (DLPFC),可以减少这种效应,减轻回声室偏差.
科学领域:
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
背景情况:
- 个人往往寻求与现有信仰保持一致的信息,创建回声室.
- 这些回声室可以强化偏见,并可能放大极端主义.
- 了解群体动态和神经机制对于解决两极分化至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查是否群体的同质性驱动态度极端.
- 检查执行控制区域的脑间同步是否能缓和同质性和极端主义之间的联系.
- 为了探索回声室效应的神经支柱.
主要方法:
- 188名参与者被分为同质或异质的四个小组.
- 一个道德判断任务涉及私人评级和小组讨论.
- 功能近红外光谱学 (fNIRS) 测量了大脑活动,重点关注脊侧前额皮层 (DLPFC) 中的大脑间同步.
主要成果:
- 与异质群体相比,在同质群体中的讨论导致了更极端的观点.
- 在讨论期间DLPFC中更高的脑间同步减少了同质性对极端主义的影响.
- 这表明神经机制可以缓解群体内的两极分化.
结论:
- 群体的一致性可以促进态度极端.
- 在DLPFC中,脑间同步起到调节者的作用,减少了同质讨论的两极分化效应.
- 同步的神经活动可能提供一种途径来抵消有害的回声室动态.
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
38.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.4K
Groupthink
49.0K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
49.0K
Echo
891
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
891
In- and Out-Groups
42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K
Cognitive Dissonance
36.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.8K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
255
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
255


