人工智能解释的权利:在一个孤独的地方
Alycia Noë1, Sarah Bouhouita-Guermech1, Ma'n H Zawati1
1Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Journal of medical Internet research
|September 12, 2025
概括
解释权旨在解决围绕医疗保健中人工智能 (AI) 的担忧. 然而,像北克这样的模糊立法.
科学领域:
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
- 医疗法 法律 医疗法
- 医疗保健中的人工智能
背景情况:
- 越来越多地将技术,特别是人工智能 (AI) 纳入医疗保健决策中.
- 人们越来越担心自动化医疗决策过程中的透明度和问责制.
- "解释权"的出现,作为对公众对人工智能的担忧的立法回应.
研究的目的:
- 探索北克省关于医疗保健中解释权的第5号法律的实际含义.
- 分析解释权对自动化医疗决策的国际影响.
- 评估解释权在解决医学中与AI相关的恐惧方面的有效性.
主要方法:
- 分析立法条款,特别是北克州的第5号法律.
- 在医疗保健的背景下检查"获得解释的权利".
- 讨论对医生通知患者的义务的影响.
主要成果:
- 预计获得解释的权利将改变医生的义务,特别是通知义务.
- 目前关于解释权的立法草案是模糊的,并提出了执法挑战.
- 法律的模糊性可能会限制其在提供有意义的患者保护方面的有效性.
结论:
- 解释权虽然旨在培养信任,但在医疗保健中面临着重大实际障碍.
- 模糊的立法削弱了受人工智能影响的个人获得解释权的保护潜力.
- 像人工智能这样的创新技术需要同样复杂和有效的政策解决方案,超出目前的解释权.
相关概念视频
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
5.3K
An important concept in studying metabolism and energy is that of chemical equilibrium. Most chemical reactions are reversible. They can proceed in both directions, releasing energy into their environment in one direction, and absorbing it from the environment in the other direction. The same is true for the chemical reactions involved in cell metabolism, such as the breaking down and building up of proteins into and from individual amino acids, respectively. Reactants within a closed system...
5.3K
Ethics in Research
25.4K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.4K
Reason and Intuition
7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K
Inductive Reasoning
65.3K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
65.3K
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology
2.2K
Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
2.2K
Deductive Reasoning
64.5K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
64.5K

