人们认为他们比其他人更难预测吗? 普罗宁和库格勒 (2010) 的实验1的三次复制
Subramanya Prasad Chandrashekar1, Stephanie Permut2, Hallgeir Sjåstad3
1Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO.
概括
人们认为他们自己的自由意志比别人更强大,认为他们的行为不太可预测. 复制证实了这种自我-其他在可预测性上的不对称性,特别是在单个评估中.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
背景情况:
- 普罗宁和库格勒 (2010) 在自由意志感知中提出了自我-其他不对称性.
- 这种不对称性表明个人认为他们拥有比其他人更多的自由意志.
- 之前的研究表明,人们认为自己的决定比别人更难预测.
研究的目的:
- 为了复制普罗宁和库格勒 (2010) 关于自由意志感知的发现.
- 调查主体间与主体内设计对这一现象的影响.
- 检查跨文化差异在自由意志的归因.
主要方法:
- 用不同的样本进行了三次预先注册的复制 (香港本科生,美国MTurk,美国Prolific).
- 研究1a和1b采用了一种复杂的设计,反映了原始研究 (自我-其他之间,过去-未来内).
- 第二项研究对比了单个数据收集中的受试者和受试者内部设计.
主要成果:
- 复制 (1a和1b研究) 支持了最初的发现,尽管效应大小较小.
- 在感知可预测性的自我-其他不对称性被复制使用主体之间的设计 (研究2).
- 在研究2中使用受试者内部设计时没有发现显著的影响,这表明参与者对不对称性进行了纠正.
结论:
- 这项研究提供了关于自我-其他不对称的证据,支持对自己有更大的自由意志的概念.
- 这些发现强调了研究设计的关键作用,区分单一和联合评估模式.
- 结果表明,当人们同时评估自己和他人时,人们会调整他们对可预测性的看法,从而减轻自我-他人不对称.
更多相关视频
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
08:01Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
Published on: October 28, 2020
相关概念视频
The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
