无法理解决定主义还是无法衡量理解力? 自由意志实验哲学中的方法论问题
Florian Cova1,2, Tristan Martinez3
1Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
概括
对于使用片刻来研究关于确定性和自由意志的民间直觉的怀疑是过早的. 改进的图片设计和参与者抽样显著减少理解错误,验证了这一研究方法.
科学领域:
- 思想的哲学 思想的哲学
- 实验哲学 实验哲学的哲学
- 认知科学 认知科学
背景情况:
- 实验哲学探讨了人们对确定性,自由意志和道德责任的直觉,使用确定性宇宙片刻.
- 之前的研究表明,参与者对这些图片有显著的理解缺陷,质疑它们的有效性.
研究的目的:
- 重新评估描绘决定性宇宙的图片中理解错误的程度.
- 调查改进的图片设计和采样方法是否可以减轻这些错误.
- 评估使用片刻来探讨人们对确定性和自由意志的直觉的持续可行性.
主要方法:
- 进行了五项研究,采用修订后的图片设计,并增强了对确定性的描述.
- 利用改进的参与者采样和验证的测量工具.
- 分析理解错误及其对关于自由意志和道德责任的直觉的影响.
主要成果:
- 过去的研究可能高估了由于不可靠的样本和未经验证的措施而导致的理解失败.
- 新的,更详细的图片显著减少了理解错误.
- 理解错误对参与者的直觉的影响大大减少.
结论:
- 对于使用片来探讨人们对决定性论,自由意志和道德责任的直觉的怀疑是过早的.
- 仔细的图片构造和参与者选择对于可靠的实验哲学研究至关重要.
- 通过短片探讨民间直觉的项目仍然是哲学研究的可行途径.
更多相关视频
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
4.4K
08:01Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
Published on: October 28, 2020
6.0K
相关概念视频
The Scientific Method
64.8K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.8K
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
160
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
160
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
500
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
500
Introspection
209
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
209
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
798
Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished.
798
