种族在阵容建设中的作用
Melisa Akan1, Jeffrey J Starns1, Andrew L Cohen1
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Journal of experimental psychology. General
|September 15, 2025
概括
种族显著影响了目击者阵容的构建. 这项研究发现,在不同种族群体中,人们对面部相似性的看法是一致的,这导致了公平的阵容,无论构造者或嫌疑人的种族如何.
科学领域:
- 法医心理学 法医心理学
- 目击者身份识别 目击者身份识别
- 感知科学 感知科学
背景情况:
- 种族对目击者识别程序的影响,特别是阵容构建的影响,仍未得到充分研究.
- 评估阵容公平性的现有方法往往忽视了种族认知在相似性判断中的作用.
研究的目的:
- 调查种族在目击者识别队列的构建和评估中的作用.
- 引入多维缩放方法来评估阵容属性和公平性.
- 检查同种族和跨种族的认知如何影响嫌疑人填充器相似性和阵容公平性.
主要方法:
- 研究1:评估黑人和白人面孔之间的感知面部相似性,使用同种族和跨种族的参与者来推导"面部空间".
- 研究2:利用这些面孔空间来评估黑人和白人参与者为黑人和白人嫌疑人构建的阵容的公平性和嫌疑人填充器相似性.
- 采用多维缩放来表示和分析感知到的面部相似性.
主要成果:
- 对相对面部相似性的感知在黑人和白人面部组合的同种族和跨种族感知者之间是一致的.
- 由同种族和跨种族制造商构建的阵容显示出可比的可疑填充器相似性和公平性.
- 无论嫌疑人的种族或假设的目击者的种族,都保持了阵容公平性.
结论:
- 阵容构造者的种族背景似乎不会影响阵容的公平性或嫌疑人填充者的相似性.
- 这些发现表明,无论种族如何,个人在选择填充剂时都会考虑与嫌疑人的相似性和独特性.
- 对实际的法医阵容构造的影响表明,为了公平的结果,可能不需要多样化的构造者观点.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
94.7K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.7K
Robbers Cave
14.7K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.7K
Ranks
436
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
436
The Representativeness Heuristic
16.7K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.7K
Relationship Formation
45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Types of Selection
43.7K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
43.7K


