区分极端和中点响应风格模型作为单个维度与两个独立维度的对立极点之间的模型:模拟研究
Martijn Schoenmakers1, Maria Bolsinova1, Jesper Tijmstra1
1Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Applied psychological measurement
|September 16, 2025
概括
本研究研究了如何在问卷中建模极端和中点响应风格. 结果表明,像AIC和BIC这样的信息标准可以区分具有足够数据的响应风格模型.
科学领域:
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
- 量化心理学 量化心理学
- 调查方法 调查方法
背景情况:
- 极端和中点响应风格可以降低利克特类问卷数据的有效性.
- 现有的文献提供了对这些响应风格的不同的概念化:单维 (相反的极点) 与多维 (单独的维度).
- 模型的选择影响复杂性,参数估计,以及在物件响应理论 (IRT) 模型中检测和纠正响应风格的能力.
研究的目的:
- 实证地确定极点和中点响应是否可以作为单独的维度与单一维度的相反极点区分.
- 为了比较响应风格的不同建模方法的性能.
- 评估信息标准 (AIC,BIC) 在响应风格分析的模型选择中的有用性.
主要方法:
- 利用多维名义响应模型来表示响应风格的各种概念化.
- 使用阿卡伊克信息标准 (AIC) 和贝叶斯信息标准 (BIC) 来进行模型比较.
- 进行模拟研究并分析经验数据集以评估模型性能.
主要成果:
- 当样本大小,测试长度和响应风格强度充足时,AIC和BIC在区分竞争模型方面表现良好.
- 在识别没有响应风格的模型方面,BIC表现出了卓越的表现.
- 当存在多个响应样式维度时,AIC的表现优于BIC.
结论:
- 信息标准 (AIC,BIC) 是在IRT中选择适当的响应风格模型的有效工具,只要提供足够的数据.
- 选择AIC和BIC可能取决于数据的特定特征,特别是多个响应样式维度的存在.
- 结果为研究人员提供了关于建模和纠正响应风格的实用指南,以提高问卷有效性.
更多相关视频
07:43Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
Published on: August 4, 2023
2.7K
07:34Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
17.9K
相关概念视频
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
196
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
196
Response Surface Methodology
609
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
609
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
254
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
254
Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck
1.2K
Hans and Sybil Eysenck developed a widely recognized theory of personality, which emphasizes the role of temperament and genetically based differences in shaping individual traits. Their theory posits that biological factors primarily determine personality and can be understood through two main dimensions: extroversion/introversion and neuroticism/stability.
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
1.2K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
480
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
480
Group Design
10.2K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.2K
