个人对危险饮酒的看法和酒精指南 - - 定性分析
Joel Crawford1, Richard Cooke2, Gillian W Shorter3
1Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Services, Division of Society and Health, Linköping University, Linköping, 581 83, Sweden. joel.crawford@liu.se.
许多人认为饮酒有风险是基于个人经验和情感,而不仅仅是指导方针. 了解这些感知是支持饮酒行为改变的关键.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 风险饮酒在欧洲很常见,尽管有官方指导方针.
- 了解个人对危险饮酒的看法和指导方针至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 探索个人对冒险饮酒的看法.
- 调查个人如何看待酒精指南的相关性.
- 了解形成这些感知背后的过程.
主要方法:
- 在线调查,来自瑞典和英国的308名参与者.
- 使用开放式问题,通过主题和框架分析进行分析.
主要成果:
- 对危险饮酒的看法是由个人经历,情绪和对酒精问题,控制,应对和伤害的担忧所塑造的.
- 酒精指南经常受到怀疑和否认,个人承认风险,表现出矛盾.
- 许多超越建议的人并不认为他们的行为有风险.
结论:
- 风险饮酒的看法涉及个人背景,情绪,酒精影响和社会影响,超出了消费范围.
- 酒精风险指导可能被误解,导致建议与感知到的个人风险之间断绝联系.
- 了解主观风险感知可以为行为改变策略提供信息.
更多相关视频
08:45Modeling Alcohol Consumption in Rodents Using Two-Bottle Choice Home Cage Drinking and Microstructural Analysis
Published on: November 8, 2024
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
相关概念视频
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
