在生态瞬间评估 (EMA) 中的响应时间:通过漂移扩散模型来阐明响应过程
Stefan Schneider1,2,3,4, Raymond Hernandez1, Doerte U Junghaenel1,2,3,4
1Center for Self-Report Science & Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, 635 Downey Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089-3332, USA.
Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)
|September 19, 2025
概括
漂移扩散模型可以在生态瞬间评估 (EMA) 中分析响应时间. 这种认知模型有助于理解个人在EMA调查期间如何快速和彻底处理信息的差异.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
- 行为科学是一种行为科学.
背景情况:
- 生态瞬间评估 (EMA) 反应背后的心理过程还未得到充分研究.
- 漂移扩散模型是分析响应时间 (RT) 数据的突出认知心理学工具.
- 该模型区分信息处理速度 (漂移率) 和证据积累值 (边界分离).
研究的目的:
- 研究漂移扩散模型对EMA响应时间的适用性.
- 在EMA期间探索认知过程中人与人之间的变化.
- 评估来自EMA数据的扩散模型参数的可靠性和有效性.
主要方法:
- 分析了来自954名参与"了解美国研究" (29,067次) 的EMA数据.
- 将项目-响应-理论扩散模型应用于暂时负面影响评级的RT.
- 检查参数稳定性,解释差异,以及与活动和人格特征的关系.
主要成果:
- 扩散模型参数 (漂移率,边界分离) 在EMA场合中表现出中等稳定性.
- 这些参数解释了大部分RT变异,并显示了个体内和个体之间的交叉项目对应.
- 随着时间的推移,参数的变化建议实践效应涉及不同的认知过程;与活动和特征的关系在理论上是预期的.
结论:
- 漂移扩散模型对EMA数据可靠且有效.
- 该模型为了解EMA影响评级的基础认知过程提供了有价值的工具.
- 这些发现支持使用扩散模型参数来研究EMA反应动态中的个体差异.
相关概念视频
01:05Instinctive Drift
659
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
659
00:56Noncompartmental Analysis: Statistical Moment Theory
376
Noncompartmental analyses leverage statistical moment theory to examine time-related changes in macroscopic events, encapsulating the collective outcomes stemming from the constituent elements in play. Statistical moment theory is a mathematical approach used to describe the time course of drug concentration in the body without assuming a specific compartmental model. SMT provides insights into drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination by treating drug concentration versus time...
376