隐藏在眼前的歧视:关于不同影响政策的推理的发展
Aarthi K Popat1, Jamie Amemiya2, Gail D Heyman3
1Department of Psychology, Yale University.
Journal of experimental psychology. General
|September 24, 2025
概括
不同影响的政策是中立的,但间接歧视性的,被视为灵活的. 强有力的理由增加了对这些政策的接受,影响了整个发展的道德评价.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 道德发展道德发展
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
背景情况:
- 不同影响政策在形式上是中立的,但可以间接歧视受保护群体.
- 这些政策的意图和合法性往往不清楚,导致道德模两可.
- 了解这些政策是如何评估的,尤其是在早期的道德推理中,至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 测试一种新的说法,即不同的影响政策在道德上是模两可的,并被灵活评估.
- 检查儿童和成人这种灵活评估的发展轨迹.
- 确定影响道德接受间接歧视政策的因素.
主要方法:
- 两项涉及美国儿童 (5-12岁) 和成年人的实验评估了间接歧视女孩的政策 (短发规则).
- 参与者的评价被评估为政策的明确理由和没有明确理由.
- 在成年人中测量了政治保守主义,以探索其与政策接受的关系.
主要成果:
- 从7岁开始的儿童和成年人对没有提供理由的政策进行了负面评价.
- 当给出强有力的理由 (防止伤害) 时,政策接受度显著增加,但不是循环推理.
- 政治保守主义与成年人对政策的接受度更高相关.
结论:
- 人们根据情境证据,特别是理由,灵活地评估不同的影响政策.
- 强有力的理由可以促进在不同发展阶段间接歧视性政策的道德接受.
- 这项研究强调了背景和理由在塑造不同影响的政策的道德判断中的作用.
相关概念视频
Halo Effect
408
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
408
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
94.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
360
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
360
Cause and Effect
12.1K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.1K
Hindsight Biases
4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.2K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
41.9K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
41.9K


