Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Virtual reality enhances ophthalmic anatomy learning: experimental evidence on comparable outcomes with peer and expert facilitators.

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

Raeder's paratrigeminal neuralgia secondary to internal carotid artery dissection mimicking trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia: a case report.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Automated scoring of student videos in medical education: a comparison between a large language model and expert evaluation.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026
Same author

Validity of AI-generated multiple-choice questions in medical education: a systematic review.

Postgraduate medical journal·2026
Same author

Large Language Models in Professionalism and Ethical Decision-Making Education: A Transferable Process for Generating Concordance of Professional Judgment Items.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same author

Applications and Outcomes of Large‑Language‑Model‑Generated Feedback in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Medical science educator·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 11, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.1K

"ChatGPT可能会犯错误"警告失败:一个随机对照试验失败了.

Yavuz Selim Kıyak1, Özlem Coşkun1, Işıl İrem Budakoğlu1

  • 1Department of Medical Education and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Medical education
|September 25, 2025
PubMed
概括

人工智能警告不会改变医学学生的诊断决策. 学生已经不信任人工智能,这表明简单的免责声明不足以对人工智能辅助学习进行校准的信任.

科学领域:

  • 医学教育 医学教育
  • 医疗保健中的人工智能
  • 认知心理学 认知心理学

背景情况:

  • 像ChatGPT这样的AI系统越来越多地用于临床决策,需要了解它们的错误性.
  • 警告是常见的,但它们对医学学生诊断行为的影响在很大程度上是未知的.
  • 法官-顾问系统 (JAS) 理论提供了一个框架来探索警告如何通过影响顾问的可信度来影响咨询.

研究的目的:

  • 调查关于人工智能错误性的警告是否会改变医学学生的诊断行为.
  • 检查警告对咨询和人工智能顾问的可信度的影响.
  • 在人工智能支持的医学教育背景下完善咨询理论.

主要方法:

  • 一个随机对照试验,涉及186名医学四年级学生评估模两可的临床细节.
  • 学生被指派接受人工智能反,有或没有关于人工智能错误性的警告.
  • 在AI反后,通过诊断变化来衡量咨询,并使用变化率,建议权重 (WoA) 和混合效应模型进行分析.

主要成果:

  • 警告的存在没有显著影响学生的诊断变化 (15.3%对15.9%).
  • 建议权重 (WoA) 比JAS元分析中先前报告的要低得多,这表明学生通常低于AI建议的权重.

更多相关视频

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

11.1K
A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

7.3K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.6K
  • 观察到警告组中的学生倾向于为不同意AI反提供更多解释.
  • 结论:

    • 人工智能免责声明不会改变医学学生的诊断咨询行为,因为感知到的可信度已经很低.
    • 存在一个可信度门,超出这个门后,警告线索对人工智能建议的利用产生最小的影响.
    • 简单的警告可能不足以确保在医疗学习和决策中使用人工智能时进行适当的信任校准.