规范化数据在确定MVC测量的可靠性方面可能存在局限性
Christoph Anders1, Christin Alex2, Max Herzberg2
1Division of Motor Research, Pathophysiology and Biomechanics; Experimental Trauma Surgery, Department for Hand, Reconstructive, and Trauma Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany. Christoph.anders@med.uni-jena.de.
Scientific reports
|September 25, 2025
概括
测量数据的规范化可能会影响可靠性参数. 这项研究发现,使用正常化的力值来延伸和曲车的可靠性下降,这表明原始数据更适合这些计算.
科学领域:
- 生物力学 生物力学
- 人类运动科学科学 人类运动科学
- 测量科学 测量科学 测量科学
背景情况:
- 测量数据的可靠性对于科学发现至关重要.
- 规范化通常用于减少变化和提高可解释性.
- 规范化对可靠性参数的影响尚未完全理解.
研究的目的:
- 调查规范化如何影响可靠性参数.
- 检查正常化对体延伸和曲的最大力值的影响.
- 确定标准化数据是否适用于可靠性计算.
主要方法:
- 85名健康人群 (42名女性) 经过两周间隔对干部肌肉进行最大同度力测试.
- 测量包括原始和人类测量标准化的力值.
- 使用类内相关系数 (ICC),标准测量误差 (SEm),标准平均误差 (SEM) 和方法误差变化系数 (CVME) 来评估可靠性和一致性.
主要成果:
- 原始的力量数据显示出良好的可靠性 (ICC > 0.88).
- 正常化导致整个组的ICC值较低 (延伸:0.803,弹性:0.768).
- 在ICC的偏差在亚群 (女性和男性) 之间有所不同.
结论:
- 测量值的规范化可以改变计算的可靠性参数.
- 在可靠性计算中不建议使用规范化数据.
- 应优先使用原始测量数据来评估干部肌肉力测量的可靠性.
相关概念视频
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
99.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
99.8K
Statistical Analysis: Overview
14.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
14.6K
Interval Level of Measurement
18.0K
For effective statistical analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
18.0K
Random and Systematic Errors
14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
50.2K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
50.2K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
2.9K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.9K


