Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.1K
Natural and Artificial Concepts01:24

Natural and Artificial Concepts

542
In psychology, concepts can be divided into two categories: natural and artificial. Natural concepts are formed through direct or indirect experiences. For example, consider the concept of snow. If you live in a place with regular snowfall, such as Essex Junction, Vermont, you know snow through direct experiences. You’ve seen it fall, touched it, shoveled it, and played in it. You recognize its texture, appearance, and even its smell. In contrast, if you live on an island like Saint...
542
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

10.0K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
10.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

562
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
562
Concepts and Prototypes01:24

Concepts and Prototypes

508
The human nervous system handles vast amounts of information by translating sensory stimuli into neural impulses, which the brain processes, creating thoughts expressed through language or stored as memories. The brain also synthesizes information from emotions and memories, which significantly influence thoughts and behaviors. This intricate process creates a comprehensive mental picture.
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...
508

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Orchestrator multi-agent clinical decision support system for secondary headache diagnosis in primary care.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Topic-Aware Summarization of Lived Health Care Experiences: Large Language Model Evaluation Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same author

Reframing AI for Rare Disease Recognition.

Research square·2026
Same author

Desiderata for a biomedical knowledge network: opportunities, challenges and future directions.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

A kernel density estimation-based approach for quantifying O-GlcNAcylation dysregulation in cancer from gene expression data.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

Development of a rule-based natural language processing algorithm to extract sleep information in pediatric primary care patients with a sleep diagnosis.

Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society·2026
Same journal

HIV Transmission Dynamics in Greater Mexico City are Shaped by Dense Spatial Mixing.

Research square·2026
Same journal

A UCP1-IRES-Cre Knock-In Mouse Enables Specific Brown Adipocyte Targeting Without CNS Off-Target Expression.

Research square·2026
Same journal

Precision RNAi for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: a combinatorial, unimolecular, allele selective approach.

Research square·2026
Same journal

Perceptions of end-of-life care quality among bereaved closest contacts of community-dwelling older Australians: a cross-sectional survey of the ASPREE cohort.

Research square·2026
Same journal

Heavy-chain immune repertoire sequencing enables language-model prediction of antigen-specific antibodies.

Research square·2026
Same journal

25+ Years of TRPV4: From Discovery to Translational Horizons.

Research square·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.4K

医学错误:在临床概念提取中进行系统错误分析的机器辅助框架.

Hongfang Liu1, Sunyang Fu2, Qiuhao Lu2

  • 1University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Research square
|September 26, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

一个新的框架,MedError,标准化了用于临床概念提取的错误分析. 这种机器辅助的人在循环系统改善了临床自然语言处理模型的评估.

关键词:
欧洲人权理事会 欧洲人权理事会错误分析 错误分析在NLP中,我们使用了NLP.

更多相关视频

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
09:20

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications

Published on: February 23, 2019

9.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.4K
Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
09:20

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications

Published on: February 23, 2019

9.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

科学领域:

  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
  • 自然语言处理自然语言处理.
  • 临床数据科学 临床数据科学

背景情况:

  • 错误分析对于临床概念提取模型至关重要,这是临床自然语言处理 (NLP) 中的一个关键任务.
  • 目前的错误分析缺乏标准化,需要专家判断,并阻碍可重复性.
  • 临床文本的变化使模型评估复杂化.

研究的目的:

  • 开发和验证MedError,一个用于临床概念提取中的系统和增强错误分析的新型框架.
  • 通过机器辅助的人在循环方法来标准化评估临床NLP模型的过程.

主要方法:

  • 在三家医院收集和整理了4,237份临床笔记中的1,187个独特错误.
  • 使用经过验证的分类学定义错误类别,分类480个错误负数和707个错误正数.
  • 评估了用于自动错误分类的大型语言模型 (LLM),并开发了具有用户友好的界面的MedError框架.

主要成果:

  • MedError集成了LLM辅助的分类和推理,以进行高效,可重复和上下文意识的错误分析.
  • 该框架支持单站点和联合多站点分析.
  • 在25种类型和48种临床概念类别中成功分类错误.

结论:

  • MedError提供了一个标准化,机器辅助的框架,以增强临床概念提取错误分析.
  • 该系统有助于在现实世界医疗保健环境中有效部署临床NLP工具.
  • 改善临床NLP模型的评估和改进.