Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.9K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.9K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.9K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

562
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
562
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

471
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
471
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.2K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.2K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

383
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
383

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Adaptive fuzzy cluster-guided simple, fast, and efficient feature selection for high-dimensional and highly imbalanced binary-class bioinformatics microarray data.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

ACG-SFE: Adaptive cluster-guided simple, fast, and efficient feature selection for high-dimensional microarray data in binary classification.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Factors influencing the success of targeted weight loss in healthcare providers with overweight and obesity after a six-month weight reduction intervention program.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Developing a Supplementary Diagnostic Tool for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation Using Ensemble Transfer Learning.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Deep Learning Based Methods for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Future Direction.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Over-the-Counter Breast Cancer Classification Using Machine Learning and Patient Registration Records.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.5K

在二进制诊断测试中使用缩放逆概率重新抽样进行部分验证偏差校正.

Wan Nor Arifin1, Umi Kalsom Yusof2

  • 1Biostatistics and Research Methodology Unit, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia.

PloS one
|September 26, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

新的方法,缩放的逆概率加权重新抽样 (SIPW) 和SIPW-B,减少偏差和标准错误的诊断准确性研究受影响的部分验证偏差 (PVB). 这些方法改进了反向概率引导 (IPB) 方法,以获得更可靠的测试评估.

更多相关视频

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.9K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

16.5K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.9K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 诊断试验评价 诊断试验评价
  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学

背景情况:

  • 诊断准确性研究对于验证新的医学测试与黄金标准相匹配至关重要.
  • 部分验证偏差 (PVB) 源于选择性患者验证,导致不准确的灵敏度 (Sn) 和特异性 (Sp) 估计.
  • 现有的方法,如反向概率引导 (IPB) 正确PVB,但可以有更高的标准错误,只调整经过验证的数据.

研究的目的:

  • 引入和评估两种新的方法,即缩放的逆概率加权重新采样 (SIPW) 和SIPW-B,旨在克服现有的PVB校正技术的局限性.
  • 使用模拟和真实世界的临床数据,比较SIPW和SIPW-B与IPB和其他既定方法的性能.

主要方法:

  • 开发SIPW和SIPW-B,扩展IPB方法,用于纠正诊断准确性研究中的部分验证偏差.
  • 利用模拟数据集,使用不同的疾病流行率,Sn,Sp和样本大小,以及两个已建立的临床数据集.
  • 绩效评估的重点是Sn和Sp估计的偏差和标准误差 (SE).

主要成果:

  • 在模拟数据中,SIPW和SIPW-B都显示了Sn和Sp的偏差和SE明显低于IPB.
  • 新方法的性能与现有技术相提并论,并且在疾病流行率低的情况下显示出强度.
  • SIPW和SIPW-B在临床数据集上产生了与既有方法一致的结果,并允许完全恢复数据.

结论:

  • 通过有效解决部分验证偏差,SIPW和SIPW-B在诊断测试评估中提供了更高的准确性和可靠性.
  • 这些方法为现有技术提供了有价值的替代方案,特别是在疾病流行率低的场景中.
  • 虽然计算密集,但SIPW和SIPW-B的增强精度和完整数据恢复能力代表了显著的进步.