报告准则可用于促进基于证据的研究原则的报告:一项跨部门研究
Tea Kabić1, Marija Šimundić Munitić2, Ishanka Weerasekara3
1School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Split, Croatia.
Journal of clinical epidemiology
|October 5, 2025
概括
大多数健康研究报告准则缺乏基于证据的研究 (EBR) 原则. 加强协议指导和调整标准对于透明的报告和减少研究浪费至关重要.
科学领域:
- 卫生研究方法论 卫生研究方法论
- 科学报告标准 科学报告标准
背景情况:
- 基于证据的研究 (EBR) 原则对于高效和有影响力的科学研究至关重要.
- 报告准则旨在提高健康研究出版物的透明度和质量.
研究的目的:
- 在健康研究报告准则中评估基于证据的研究 (EBR) 原则的整合和实施.
- 评估协议和完整报告准则在多大程度上促进EBR.
主要方法:
- 一项横截面研究分析了报告准则,并使用了来自EQUATOR网络网站的检查清单.
- 两位独立审查员对219条适用于整个报告的指南进行了审查,以检查EBR原则.
主要成果:
- 只有很少的一小部分指南 (4.1%的检查清单,2.3%的文章) 包含了基于EBR的新研究的理由.
- 较少的指导方针涉及最佳研究设计 (3.2%的检查清单,0.9%的文章) 或结果的上下文化 (1.4%的检查清单,0.9%的文章).
结论:
- 目前的报告准则不充分纳入基于证据的核心研究 (EBR) 原则.
- 协议指导对于设计阶段至关重要,而报告指导则应加强透明的报告,特别是结果上下文化.
- 加强协议指导,调整标准和改善指导方针的实施对于支持EBR和最大限度地减少研究浪费至关重要.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Study Designs in Epidemiology
881
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
881
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.3K
Introduction to Epidemiology
1.7K
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
1.7K
Cross-Sectional Research
12.4K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.4K
Observational Studies
10.7K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
10.7K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
1.1K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.1K


