Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Further validation of PCL-5 symptom validity indices in cross-cultural forensic settings.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2026
Same author

Examining intraindividual variability in neuropsychological test performance: Implications for identifying cognitive impairment and tracers of invalidity.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same author

A Population Wide Analysis of MCMI-IV Symptom Validity Scales Administered in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same author

Interpreting the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) validity scales: Leveraging population-level Veteran Affairs (VA) data from 2008 to 2024.

Psychological assessment·2025
Same author

Examining prolonged exposure outcomes when session frequency is limited: Preliminary findings from a Veteran sample.

Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association·2025
Same author

Validation of PCL-5 symptom validity indices in a Cross-Cultural Forensic Sample.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
13:09

Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol

Published on: April 1, 2018

10.9K

当一个性能有效性测试失败时,表明神经心理反应无效.

Laurence M Binder1,2, Philip K Martin3, Ryan W Schroeder3,4,5

  • 1Independent Practice, Beaverton, OR, USA.

The Clinical neuropsychologist
|October 6, 2025
PubMed
概括

神经心理学通常需要两个性能有效性测试 (PVT) 失败才能认为答案无效. 然而,失败的Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM),特别是特定的分数,可能是足够的证据本身的无效.

关键词:
性能有效性的有效性.失败的失败失败的失败失败的失败无效的无效的无效的无效的无效的两个人的规则.

更多相关视频

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.6K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
13:09

Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol

Published on: April 1, 2018

10.9K
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.6K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.6K

科学领域:

  • 神经心理学 神经心理学
  • 法医心理学 法医心理学
  • 心理评估 心理评估

背景情况:

  • 神经心理学的标准指导方针表明,为了确定响应无效性,需要两个性能有效性测试 (PVT) 的失败.
  • 本研究探讨了对这一规则的潜在例外,考虑到使用的特定PVT和性能缺陷的严重性.

研究的目的:

  • 确定单个PVT上的故障是否可以作为响应无效的充分证据.
  • 检查不同PVT上的故障之间的关系,特别是内存恶意测试 (TOMM) 和可靠数字间隔 (RDS) 的测试.
  • 评估TOMM或RDS上的特定故障值是否预测了额外的PVT故障.

主要方法:

  • 261名成年参与者完成了包括4-12个PVT在内的神经心理测试电池,其中始终包括TOMM和RDS.
  • 进行了统计分析,以评估单个PVT的故障之间的关联.
  • 分析了TOMM,RDS和其他PVT之间的故障率和故障一致性.

主要成果:

  • 16.5%的人没有通过TOMM,其中97.7%的人也没有通过另一项PVT.
  • 14.2%的人没有通过RDS,其中75.7%的人也没有通过另一项PVT.
  • 试验2或保留<43的TOMM分数表明至少在另一个PVT上100%失败,这表明有足够的无效证据.

结论:

  • 虽然建议使用多个PVT,但TOMM故障,特别是在特定的得分值,可能足以确定当多个PVT无法使用时的响应无效性.
  • 需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现在不同的PVT和人群中.