对同行,近同行和人工智能辅助方法对SOAP笔记的教师评分进行比较
John Pham1, Krista L Donohoe1, Dayanjan Wijesinghe1
1Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, Richmond, VA, USA.
American journal of pharmaceutical education
|October 6, 2025
概括
公司内部的GPT-4应用程序 (GRADES) 与教师对主观,目标,评估,计划 (SOAP) 笔记的评分密切匹配,与同行或ChatGPT Plus方法不同. 这一发现表明AI在教育评估中的潜力.
科学领域:
- 药房 教育 教育 药房 教育
- 教育中的人工智能
- 评估方法 评估方法
背景情况:
- 教师对主观,目标,评估,计划 (SOAP) 笔记的评分对于学生药剂师培训至关重要.
- 评估评分的一致性和效率对于有效的教育反至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较使用教师,同行,近同行,ChatGPT Plus和基于GPT-4的应用程序 (GRADES) 的SOAP笔记的评分准确度.
- 评估不同分级方法的效率.
主要方法:
- 83名第二年学生药剂师完成了实践SOAP笔记.
- 根据教师,同行,近同行,ChatGPT Plus和GRADES进行了SOAP笔记的评分.
- 统计分析 (弗里德曼测试) 比较了标记分数的变化;时间效率也得到了评估.
主要成果:
- 班级 (66%) 和教师 (65%) 的分数相似,并且没有统计学上的差异.
- 同行 (78%),近同行 (77%) 和ChatGPT Plus (87%) 的分数与教师评分有显著差异.
- GRADES的评分准确度与教师的评分准确度相当.
结论:
- 一个内部的GPT-4应用程序 (GRADES),在教师监督下,实现了与教师评分器相似的分级分数.
- 在药学教育中,GRADES提供了一个可行的,人工智能驱动的工具,用于一致的SOAP笔记评估.
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
38.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.9K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
2.4K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.4K
Surveys
16.6K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.6K
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
2.0K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
2.0K
Nursing Evaluation
4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.7K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.7K


