神圣报复信仰的心理测量属性尺度:土耳其版本,有效性和可靠性研究在土耳其
Ece Alagöz1, Merve Bat Tonkuş2
1Maltepe University, Istanbul, Turkey. ecealagoz@maltepe.edu.tr.
Journal of religion and health
|October 6, 2025
概括
这项研究成功地将"神报应的信仰尺度" (BDRS) 改编为土耳其语,证实了其可靠性和有效性,用于评估土耳其人口的宗教信仰和痴迷.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 宗教研究是宗教研究.
- 跨文化心理学 跨文化心理学
背景情况:
- 信念体系,特别是对神圣报复的信仰,极大地影响了认知,情感和道德过程.
- 了解神圣报复信仰的影响对于解释生活挑战和道德行为至关重要.
- 心理措施的跨文化适应对于它们在不同人群中有效应用至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 翻译和文化适应"信仰神圣报应尺度" (BDRS) 到土耳其语.
- 评估BDRS.的土耳其版本的心理测量特性,包括有效性和可靠性.
- 通过评估 BDRS 与宗教痴迷之间的关系来检查合有效性.
主要方法:
- 方法研究涉及翻译,逆向翻译,专家审查和文化适应的试点测试.
- 从425名土耳其成年人中采集的数据使用了土耳其的BDRS,宾夕法尼亚州职责清单 (PIOS) 和人口调查问卷.
- 心理测量评估包括探索性和确认性因子分析 (EFA,CFA),可靠性Cronbach的alpha,以及对收有效性的Pearson相关性.
主要成果:
- 土耳其的BDRS表现出一个强大的两要素结构:相信神圣的奖励和相信神圣的惩罚,解释了64.9%的差异.
- 确认因素分析表明可以接受的模型匹配 (χ2/df = 2.370,CFI = 0.960,RMSEA = 0.078).
- 在整体尺度 (克朗巴赫α = 0.911) 和子尺度 (奖励: 0.889;惩罚: 0.799) 中发现了高的内部一致性. 在信仰神圣的报复和宗教痴迷之间观察到显著的正相关性 (r = 0.426).
结论:
- 土耳其版本的"神报应的信仰尺度"是土耳其人口使用的有效和可靠的工具.
- 该尺度有效地衡量个人与神圣的奖励和惩罚有关的宗教信仰结构.
- 研究结果支持土耳其BDRS在评估在土耳其文化背景下对宗教痴迷的倾向方面的实用性.
相关概念视频
01:29Reliability and Validity
13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
01:22Self-Report Tests of Personality
770
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
770
01:19Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
156
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
156
01:29Self-Serving Bias
206
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
206
01:29Self-Efficacy
193
Self-efficacy is the belief in one's capacity to organize and execute actions necessary to manage prospective situations. This belief significantly influences how individuals approach goals, tasks, and challenges across different domains of life.Psychological and Educational ImpactsIndividuals with strong self-efficacy are more resilient in the face of difficulties. They are more likely to adopt effective problem-solving strategies, persist through obstacles, and regulate emotions such as...
193
02:45Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.9K