Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

179
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
179
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.2K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.2K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

881
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
881
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

226
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
226
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.8K
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

10.7K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
10.7K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

AI-induced never-skilling in medical education.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

The detectability paradox: bilingual medical report generation with open-weight models and the limits of human oversight.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

How to meaningfully evaluate AI in clinical medicine.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

SpNeigh: spatial neighborhood and differential expression analysis for high-resolution spatial transcriptomics.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Impact of an Ambient AI Scribe Among Clinicians and Patients: Real-World Prospective Observational Time-Motion Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same author

DILIConsult: A Multi-Agent Large Language Model Framework for Evaluating Drug-Induced Liver Injury in ICU Settings.

Pharmacotherapy·2026
Same journal

How Does That Large Language Model Make You Feel?

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Transformation Versus Innovation in Digital Health Care and the Future of Clinical AI.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Building a Malaria Intelligence System for Real-Time Prediction and Data-Driven Intervention Planning.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Therapeutic Interaction Features of AI Chatbots in Depression Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Large Language Model Versus Multidisciplinary Team: Feasibility Study of Pancreatic Cancer Management Recommendations.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same journal

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to Launch Landmark ACCESS Program.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.7K

随机对照试验中的大型语言模型 设计:观察性研究

Liyuan Jin1, Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong1,2, Kabilan Elangovan3

  • 1Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore, 65 66016503.

Journal of medical Internet research
|October 7, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

大型语言模型 (LLM) 在改进随机对照试验 (RCT) 设计,增强招聘和通用性方面表现有前途. 虽然在干预规划方面有效,但LLM需要专家监督资格标准和结果措施,以确保安全和道德标准.

关键词:
在 GPT-4 中使用.由LLM生成的临床试验设计.临床研究伦理学临床试验设计评估临床试验设计评估资格标准 资格标准招聘多样性 招聘多样性减少试验失败,减少试验失败.

更多相关视频

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.0K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.7K
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.0K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

8.0K

科学领域:

  • 临床试验设计 临床试验设计
  • 医疗保健中的人工智能
  • 医学研究方法学 医学研究方法学

背景情况:

  • 随机对照试验 (RCT) 面临重大挑战,包括有限的概括性,参与者多样性不足和高失败率.
  • 这些局限性往往源于严格的资格标准和低效的患者选择过程.
  • 大型语言模型 (LLM) 在临床应用中显示出潜力,但它们在优化RCT设计中的作用在很大程度上尚未被探索.

研究的目的:

  • 调查LLM,特别是GPT-4-Turbo-Preview在协助RCT设计方面的能力.
  • 评估LLM在提高RCT通用性,招聘多样性和降低失败率方面的潜力.
  • 评估LLM辅助的RCT设计,同时维护临床安全和伦理标准.

主要方法:

  • 一项观察性研究分析了20个并行臂RCT (10项已完成,10项已注册) 发表于2024年1月之后.
  • 在提供标准的基础上,LLM生成RCT设计,包括资格,招聘,干预和结果.
  • 临床专家和NLP指标 (BLEU,ROUGE-L,METEOR) 的定量评估与clinicaltrials.gov数据对LLM设计准确性进行了评估;定性评估使用了利克特安全性,准确性,偏见,实用性,包容性和多样性的等级.

主要成果:

  • 在复制RCT设计方面,LLM实现了72%的整体准确性,在招聘 (88%) 和干预 (93%) 设计方面具有很高的准确性.
  • 在设计资格标准 (55%) 和结果测量 (53%) 中观察到更低的准确性.
  • 定性评估表明有强烈的临床一致性,LLM产生的设计在安全性,准确性和客观性方面与原始设计相似,同时增强了多样性和务实性.

结论:

  • 课程课程展示了提高RCT设计的巨大潜力,特别是在招聘和干预策略方面,提高了普遍性和多样性.
  • 专家监督和监管框架对于确保LLM辅助RCT设计的患者安全和伦理合规至关重要.
  • 需要进一步完善LLM,以克服符合资格标准和结果测量的局限性,以便更广泛地应用临床试验.