使用替代用途任务探索创造力研究的统计脆弱性:一个系统审查协议
Vikram Arora1,2, Alex Thabane1, Adam Sutoski3
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
PloS one
|October 7, 2025
概括
本综述使用替代用途任务 (AUT) 评估了创造力研究的统计脆弱性. 我们将评估研究结果的可靠性,以确保可靠的创造力评估.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
背景情况:
- 替代用途任务 (AUT) 是创造潜力的关键衡量标准.
- 人们对AUT研究结果的可靠性和统计脆弱性存在担忧.
- 过度依赖p值可能会导致创造力研究中不可靠的结果.
研究的目的:
- 系统地评估使用替代用途任务 (AUT) 的研究结果的统计脆弱性.
- 评估来自AUT的创意潜力测量的稳定性.
- 使用连续脆弱性指数 (CFI) 进行严格的评估.
主要方法:
- 对符合条件的双臂实验研究 (随机或非随机) 进行系统审查,报告了显著的AUT结果.
- 在Medline,Embase,PsycInfo和ERIC数据库中进行全面的文献搜索.
- 计算中位数连续脆弱性指数 (CFI) 作为主要结果;用于二次分析的多变量回归.
主要成果:
- 本部分将报告所包含的研究中CFI的中位数,表明AUT发现的统计脆弱性.
- 二次分析将探索与统计脆弱性相关的研究水平预测因素.
- 结果将量化创造力评估的稳定性.
结论:
- 结果将突出使用AUT的创造性研究的统计脆弱性的程度.
- 这项研究旨在促进创造力研究中加强报告标准和方法论严谨性.
- 这项工作鼓励更强大,更可靠地衡量创意潜力.
相关概念视频
Statistical Significance
21.0K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
21.0K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
478
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
478


