Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

553
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
553
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

4.9K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
4.9K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.3K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.3K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

5.8K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
5.8K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Using routinely collected data for research purposes: challenges and mitigation strategies.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

How to design a ROCI (Response Over Continuous Intervention) randomised trial: guidance and a case study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

A Causal Perspective on "Appropriate Implementation of ICH E9(R1) Addendum Strategies" (Comment on Fleming et al.).

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

A Fully-Integrated Bayesian Approach for the Imputation and Analysis of Derived Outcome Variables With Missingness.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

On "Confirmatory" Methodological Research in Statistics and Related Fields.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

ChatGPT as a Tool for Biostatisticians: A Tutorial on Applications, Opportunities, and Limitations.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.3K

重新思考处理方法失败的方法在比较研究中的失败.

Milena Wünsch1,2, Moritz Herrmann1,2, Elisa Noltenius3

  • 1Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Statistics in medicine
|October 9, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

对比研究中的方法失败是常见的,但处理不善. 本文为处理和报告故障的适当方法提供指导,提高数据分析可靠性.

关键词:
基准研究是指标研究.比较研究研究比较研究.没有收的非收.模拟研究是模拟研究.

更多相关视频

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.3K
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.6K

科学领域:

  • 方法论研究研究方法论研究
  • 数据分析 数据分析
  • 统计建模 统计建模

背景情况:

  • 对比研究对于选择合适的数据分析方法至关重要.
  • 在这些研究中,方法失败,如非融合,是经常面临的挑战.
  • 目前关于处理方法故障的指导是有限的,报告经常被忽视.

研究的目的:

  • 提供关于处理方法在比较研究中的失败的实际指导.
  • 解决缺乏标准化方法来处理方法失败的问题.
  • 提高对比研究结果的可信性和可解释性.

主要方法:

  • 在已发表的比较研究中审查处理方法失败的常见做法.
  • 分析经典统计和预测建模方法.
  • 根据现实的考虑和用户行为制定建议.

主要成果:

  • 现有的方法,如数据集丢弃和归算,往往不适合处理方法故障.
  • 方法失败应该被视为因素的复杂相互作用,而不仅仅是表现.
  • 建议的策略包括反映真实世界用户行为的备用选项.

结论:

  • 对方法失败的不适当处理可能会导致对比研究中的误导性结果.
  • 采用推的处理和报告策略可以提高基于证据的方法选择的可靠性.
  • 该研究为更强大,更现实的比较研究提供了框架.