Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.7K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

573
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
573
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.0K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.8K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.8K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Survival Analysis Under the Aalen's Additive Hazards Model With Covariate Measurement Error: Application to Causal Mediation Analysis.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Mediation Analysis With Exposure-Mediator Interaction and Covariate Measurement Error Under the Additive Hazards Model.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2025
Same author

Multicategory matched learning for estimating optimal individualized treatment rules in observational studies with application to a hepatocellular carcinoma study.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

Tempol, a Superoxide Dismutase Mimetic, Inhibits Wallerian Degeneration Following Spinal Cord Injury by Preventing Glutathione Depletion and Aldose Reductase Activation.

Journal of neurotrauma·2024
Same author

Consistent inverse probability of treatment weighted estimation of the average treatment effect with mismeasured time-dependent confounders.

Statistics in medicine·2022
Same author

Role of the Polyol Pathway in Locomotor Recovery and Wallerian Degeneration after Spinal Cord Contusion Injury.

Neurotrauma reports·2021

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

与测量误差相关的共变平衡

Xialing Wen1, Ying Yan1

  • 1School of Mathematics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Statistics in medicine
|October 11, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

共同变量中的测量误差可能会加剧不平衡和偏差治疗效应估计. 本研究引入了纠正策略,以改进共变量平衡方法,成功恢复平衡并消除模拟和真实数据中的偏差.

关键词:
平均治疗效果 平均治疗效果有关因果推理的推理.同变的平衡倾向得分是共变的.进入平衡的平衡测量错误的纠正 测量错误的纠正

更多相关视频

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.3K

科学领域:

  • 统计 统计 统计 统计
  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 因果推理因果推理

背景情况:

  • 共变量平衡方法对于观察性研究中的因果推理至关重要.
  • 这些方法假定准确的共变量测量,由于测量错误,这种条件往往无法满足.
  • 测量误差对共变量平衡和治疗效果估计的影响尚未得到充分理解.

研究的目的:

  • 调查未解决的测量误差对共变量平衡方法的影响.
  • 为现有的平衡技术提出新的测量误差纠正策略.
  • 证明这些纠正方法在减轻偏差和改善共变量平衡方面的有效性.

主要方法:

  • 测量错误对共变量平衡的影响的理论分析.
  • 开发一类测量错误纠正策略.
  • 模拟研究用于在各种错误场景下评估性能.
  • 应用到现实世界的观测数据.

主要成果:

  • 忽视测量误差加剧了共变异不平衡,并引入了偏差.
  • 建议的校正策略有效地平衡协变量,即使有测量误差.
  • 建议的方法消除了治疗效果估计偏差.
  • 模拟和真实数据分析证实了理论发现.

结论:

  • 测量误差是必须在共变量平衡中解决的关键问题.
  • 拟议的校正策略为处理错误测量的共变量提供了可靠的解决方案.
  • 这项工作通过提供提高观测研究可靠性的工具来推进因果推理方法.