地球观测中的噪音标签的概率机器学习
Spyros Kondylatos1,2, Nikolaos Ioannis Bountos3,4, Ioannis Prapas3,5
1Orion Lab, National Observatory of Athens & National Technical University of Athens, 15772, Athens, Greece. skondylatos@noa.gr.
Scientific reports
|October 14, 2025
概括
概率机器学习 (ML) 模型通过量化数据不确定性,有效地解决了地球观测 (EO) 中的标签噪声. 这些不确定性意识模型提高了ML解决方案的可靠性和可解释性,用于关键的EO应用.
科学领域:
- 地球观测 (EO) 是指对地球进行观测.
- 机器学习 (ML) 是指机器学习.
- 地理空间数据分析.
- 数据科学数据科学数据科学
背景情况:
- 标签噪声显著降低了在地球观测 (EO) 中监督ML模型的性能.
- 可靠的ML解决方案对于高影响力EO应用至关重要.
- 现有的方法往往无法在EO数据中考虑特定领域的噪声源.
研究的目的:
- 在EO中利用概率ML来建模输入依赖的标签噪声.
- 在EO任务中量化数据不确定性,解决独特的噪声特征.
- 开发和评估用于改进EO应用的不确定性意识ML模型.
主要方法:
- 在各种EO应用中训练不确定性意识的概率模型.
- 使用专用管道来评估模型的准确性和可靠性.
- 根据标准确定性ML方法评估性能.
主要成果:
- 在大多数EO数据集和指标中,不确定性意识模型表现出优于确定性模型的性能.
- 严格的评估验证了预测不确定性估计的可靠性.
- 通过不确定性量化实现了模型预测的增强解释性.
结论:
- 模拟标签噪声和纳入不确定性量化对于强大的EO解决方案至关重要.
- 概率式机器学习为地球观测中可靠的人工智能提供了一个有希望的方向.
- 这项研究为EO领域更可靠,更易于解释的ML应用铺平了道路.
相关概念视频
Random Error
8.1K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
8.1K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
1.3K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
1.7K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.7K
Random and Systematic Errors
14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Classification of Signals
1.3K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.3K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
3.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
3.5K

