在使用口水治疗牙过敏症的随机临床试验中遵守CONSORT声明
Lauro Taques Neto1, Letícia Maira Wambier2, Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski2
1Department of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, General Carlos Cavalcanti Avenue, 4748, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil. lauroneto15@hotmail.com.
The Saudi dental journal
|October 15, 2025
概括
这项研究评估了随机临床试验 (RCT) 对于牙过敏 (DH) 的脱敏化口水. 虽然大多数研究的偏差风险较低,但未能完全遵守CONSORT报告准则.
科学领域:
- 牙科 牙科是指牙科的专业.
- 临床试验方法论 临床试验方法论
背景情况:
- 该CONSORT声明指导随机临床试验 (RCT) 的报告.
- 许多RCT评估牙过敏性 (DH) 的脱敏口水,但其通过CONSORT指南的质量未被评估.
研究的目的:
- 评估RCT对DH脱敏口水的RCT与CONSORT指南的遵守情况.
- 为了评估这些包含的RCT中偏差的风险.
主要方法:
- 在多个数据库 (科克兰图书馆,MEDLINE,Embase等) 中进行系统搜索. 从2024年8月到10月.
- 通过使用特定的CONSORT坚持工具和Cochrane偏差风险工具评估36个选定的RCT 2.
主要成果:
- 平均CONSORT分数为23.3/32,干预和结果报告良好,但缺乏设置和协议注册.
- 根据期刊和出版日期,观察到CONSORT得分的显著差异.
- 14项研究显示偏差风险低,2项没有明确风险,没有高风险.
结论:
- 对DH脱敏口水的RCT显示出良好的方法质量,偏差风险低.
- 在这个领域,完全遵守CONSORT报告标准并未始终实现,这表明有改进的余地.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Clinical Trials
8.5K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
8.5K
Handwashing III: During the Procedure and Post-Procedure Steps
3.0K
To wash hands properly, follow these steps:
3.0K
Blinding
2.9K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.9K
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
252
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
252
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
422
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
422
Hazard Ratio
785
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
For example, in a clinical trial...
785


