环境和气候政策中的定价工具,当污染者是有限的理性
Elisabeth Gsottbauer1,2, Jeroen C J M van den Bergh3,4,5
1London School of Economics and Political Science, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, WC2A 2AE, London, UK.
概括
环境政策中的定价工具,如碳定价,提供经济利益,但面临怀疑. 这项研究发现,在行为经济学假设下,限制和贸易比碳税更有效.
科学领域:
- 环境经济学环境经济学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 气候政策 气候政策
背景情况:
- 由于效率和范围,为环境政策提倡定价工具.
- 对于他们的表现仍然存在怀疑,特别是来自社会环境科学.
- 对于定价工具的传统经济论点往往假定有理性的代理人.
研究的目的:
- 为基于价格的环境政策工具提供一个全面的案例.
- 在行为经济学假设下评估定价工具,包括有限的理性.
- 为了比较限制和贸易与环境税收在气候政策中的有效性.
主要方法:
- 对基于价格的工具的论点采取广泛的观点.
- 根据现实的行为假设 (有限的理性,对他人的行为) 检查仪器行为.
- 评估与经济模型中的理性代理假设有关的批评.
主要成果:
- 在考虑行为因素时,限制和交易系统的情况在环境税收上得到了加强.
- 定价工具的传统经济论点受到行为经济学的发现的挑战.
- 可能需要额外的工具来解决气候挑战在有限的理性.
结论:
- 基于价格的工具,特别是上限和贸易,可以成为有效的环境政策工具,即使涉及到行为因素.
- 解决怀疑主义需要承认和整合行为经济学的见解.
- 政策设计必须考虑到有限的理性和社会互动,以获得最佳的气候结果.
相关概念视频
Social Traps
26.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.3K
Framing Effects
7.9K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.9K
Solution Equilibrium and Saturation
21.4K
Imagine adding a small amount of sugar to a glass of water, stirring until all the sugar has dissolved, and then adding a bit more. You can repeat this process until the sugar concentration of the solution reaches its natural limit, a limit determined primarily by the relative strengths of the solute-solute, solute-solvent, and solvent-solvent attractive forces. You can be certain that you have reached this limit because, no matter how long you stir the solution, undissolved sugar remains. The...
21.4K


