否认科学是否存在意识形态上的差异?
1University of Illinois Chicago, 1046 N, Taylor Ave, Oak Park, IL 60302, United States.
Current opinion in psychology
|October 22, 2025
概括
政治意识形态本身并不能预测人们对科学的信任. 科学信任的差异通常在两极分化的国家中出现,在这些国家,特定的政治团体战略性地宣传对不方便的发现的怀疑.
科学领域:
- 环境科学环境科学
- 政治科学是政治学中的一个领域.
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 人们对科学信任的意识形态差异存在担忧,特别是在气候变化方面.
- 与自由主义者相比,美国保守派对科学持更大的怀疑态度.
- 然而,这种对科学信任的意识形态差距并不普遍,并且在不同国家之间存在很大差异.
研究的目的:
- 研究政治取向与对科学的信任之间的关系.
- 探索导致科学怀疑的意识形态差异的因素.
- 了解在整个政治领域的科学否认背后的认知过程的对称性.
主要方法:
- 在不同政治意识形态中对科学信任的比较分析.
- 检查政治两极化和战略怀疑在塑造科学怀疑主义中的作用.
- 跨国比较政治取向与对科学的信任之间的关联.
主要成果:
- 在大多数非美国国家,政治取向与对科学的信任之间存在很小的关联.
- 科学否认背后的认知过程是跨越意识形态线的对称.
- 科学信任的意识形态差距在高度两极分化的政治环境中出现,特定的政党或媒体宣传怀疑.
结论:
- 对科学的信任与政治意识形态并没有内在的联系.
- 科学信任的意识形态差距的出现往往是政治两极分化和战略虚假信息运动的结果.
- 意识形态差距的方向 (自由主义者与保守主义者的怀疑) 取决于哪个政党针对不适合他们的议程的科学发现.
相关概念视频
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
335
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
335
Cognitive Dissonance
36.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.8K
Confirmation Biases
7.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.6K
Group Polarization
38.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.4K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
530
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
530
Scientific Laws and Theories
86.7K
Scientific Laws
86.7K


