基于证据的建议,为整个计划的评估方法提出建议
Janica Jamieson1, Rachel Bacon2, Andrea Bramley3,4,5
1School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
这项研究开发了九个基于证据的建议,用于对饮食教育的全程序评估. 这些建议旨在增强学习,并确保学生可靠的进步决策.
科学领域:
- 饮食教育 饮食教育
- 高等教育中的评估.
- 程序性评估的程序性评估
背景情况:
- 新兴的教育理论和人工智能等技术进步需要在饮食学中更新评估策略.
- 目前的评估实践需要加强,以获得有意义的学习和可靠的进步决策.
- 对于专业标准来说,在饮食教育中需要可靠的评估至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 创建基于证据的建议,在饮食教育中实施全程序评估方法.
- 解决新教育理论和技术对学生评估的影响.
- 培养有意义的学习体验,并确保饮食学生可靠的进步决策.
主要方法:
- 一个四阶段的混合方法研究,利用系统的范围审查和专题分析.
- 通过与饮食教育工作者进行专家研讨会,反复改进提案.
- 纳入最近的研究和外部审稿人的反,以获得实际的相关性.
主要成果:
- 开发了九个关于基于证据的学生饮食评估建议.
- 关键建议包括将评估与学习成果相协调,利用各种任务获得可信的证据,培养反素养,让专家评估人员参与,并实施中间审查.
- 强调学生的代理权和机构因素对评估的影响.
结论:
- 开发的建议为饮食教育提供了一个实用的,全程序评估框架.
- 这种方法促进了增强的学习和可信的进步决策.
- 该研究建议在整个饮食学专业中使用这种共同的评估过程,以改善教育成果并应对不断变化的挑战.
更多相关视频
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
相关概念视频
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Information Processing Approach
