Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.6K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.6K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.3K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.3K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.6K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injection Transitions Across Bevacizumab, Biosimilar, and Branded Medications: The IRIS Registry Study.

Journal of vitreoretinal diseases·2026
Same author

Cataract Surgery and the Risk of Conversion from Dry to Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration in the IRIS© Registry.

Ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery, Trabeculectomy, and Tube Shunt Surgery in Secondary Glaucoma: IRIS® Registry Analysis.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Comparative Endophthalmitis Rates in Adult and Pediatric Patients across Various Ophthalmic Procedures: An IRIS® Registry Analysis.

Ophthalmology·2026
Same author

RETRACTED: Cataldi et al. Neutral Sphingomyelinase Modulation in the Protective/Preventive Role of rMnSOD from Radiation-Induced Damage in the Brain. <i>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</i> 2019, <i>20</i>, 5431.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Corneal Endothelial Keratoplasty After Glaucoma Treatment: An American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry Analysis.

Ophthalmology. Glaucoma·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
09:43

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

6.7K

大型医疗数据集中的数据重复和错误:IRIS®注册表中的案例研究.

Eric A Goldberg1, Connor J Ross1, Vivian Paraskevi Douglas1

  • 1Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Ophthalmology science
|October 27, 2025
PubMed
概括

数据错误,如重复,在美国眼科学院IRIS注册表中很常见. 该研究发现了第一实践记录与这些数据错误之间的联系,并提出了需要改进的领域.

关键词:
与年龄有关的黄斑变性.在白内障手术中进行了白内障手术.数据重复数据重复数据质量数据质量数据质量糖尿病视网膜病变 - 糖尿病视网膜病变这是一个IRIS注册表.YAG激光囊切除术是一种激光囊切除术.

更多相关视频

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
09:00

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Published on: April 13, 2021

5.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
09:43

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

6.7K
TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
09:00

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients

Published on: April 13, 2021

5.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.0K

科学领域:

  • 眼科医生 眼科 眼科
  • 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
  • 数据科学数据科学数据科学

背景情况:

  • 美国眼科学院的IRIS注册表 (视觉智能研究) 是眼科研究现实数据的宝贵来源.
  • 然而,大型数据集可能包含输入错误和数据重复,这可能会影响研究准确性.
  • 了解这些数据质量问题对于对白内障手术,糖尿病视网膜病变和与年龄相关的黄斑变性等疾病的可靠分析至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 调查IRIS注册表中输入错误和数据重复的普遍性和性质.
  • 专门检查与白内障手术 (CS) 相关的记录,胺:伊花 (YAG) 囊切除,与年龄相关的黄斑变性 (AMD) 和糖尿病视网膜病变 (DR).

主要方法:

  • 采用了回顾性队列研究设计,分析了2013-2023年的IRIS注册表数据.
  • 基于同一眼睛的多个条目,包括不同日期的条目 (Dd),确定了CS和YAG囊切除的重复记录 (Dd).
  • 在AMD和DR记录中评估过渡错误,定义为疾病严重程度随时间推移的错误分期. 使用换特征重要性 (PFI) 调查的预测因素.

主要成果:

  • 发现了显著的数据重复:30.9%的CS眼睛和29.1%的YAG囊切除眼睛有重复,分别有5.5%和4.1%的Dd.
  • 在13.6%的AMD眼睛和12.7%的DR眼睛中观察到过渡错误.
  • 分析显示,眼睛的第一次记录实践与数据错误的发生 (Dd和过渡错误) 之间存在关系.

结论:

  • 在IRIS注册表中存在数据重复和输入错误,在分析重复程序或慢性疾病时需要仔细考虑.
  • 这些发现突出了第一个记录的原始实践和数据错误之间的联系.
  • 透明度和利益相关者之间的合作对于应对这些数据质量挑战和改善数据管理至关重要.