整合性整形手术申请人研究生产率的种族差异
Forrest Bohler1, Zachary A Koenig2, Aaquib Noorani3
1Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 586 Pioneer Drive, Rochester, MI 48309, United States.
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
|October 28, 2025
概括
在医学 (ORM) 综合整形手术 (IPS) 申请者中,代表人数不足 (URM) 和代表人数过多 (ORM) 的研究成果有所不同. ORM申请者显示出更高的出版数量,而URM申请者更频繁地使用开放获取期刊,挑战了关于研究机会差异的假设.
科学领域:
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 外科住院招生入学情况
- 学术生产力 学术生产力
背景情况:
- 之前的研究发现,在整形外科实习生研究生产率上没有种族差异.
- 结合综合和独立的途径可能会掩盖在居住选择中的差异.
- 综合性整形外科 (IPS) 是具有竞争力的,并强调学术成果,使申请人差异至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 分析医学中代表性不足 (URM) 和医学中代表性过高 (ORM) 申请人之间的研究生产率差异,以综合整形外科 (IPS) 计划.
- 识别学术成果的差异,与居住地选择相关.
- 挑战有关影响出版优势的因素的假设.
主要方法:
- 从2022-2024年周期对555名匹配的IPS申请人的分析.
- 在申请截止日期之前从PubMed收集图书统计数据.
- 使用头像和姓名分析将申请人归类为URM或ORM.
- 使用曼-惠特尼U测试进行统计比较.
主要成果:
- 申请ORM的出版物总量中位数 (5对3),第一作者 (1对0) 和第二作者 (1对0) 的出版物中位数显著更高.
- 在整形外科专用出版物中没有发现显著差异 (两组中位数为1).
- URM申请者在开放获取 (OA) 期刊上发表的文章比例更高,平均OA成本更高 (750美元与657美元对比).
结论:
- 在URM和ORM IPS申请者之间的研究组合中存在可衡量的差异,这与之前的调查结果相矛盾,这些调查结果没有分离培训途径.
- ORM申请人拥有更强大的研究概况和更低的开放学费支出,突出需要检查结构因素.
- 来自顶尖医学院的URM申请人比例较高,以及OA出版物挑战了关于财务资源和研究机会的假设,这些假设推动了ORM的优势.
更多相关视频
03:07Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
806
08:05A Pre-clinical Rat Model for the Study of Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published on: November 8, 2019
7.8K
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
94.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.9K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.8K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.8K
