团队工作不安全对团队性的双刃剑效应
1Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai 200051, China.
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|October 29, 2025
概括
团队工作的不安全感通过挑战评估来促进性,但通过障碍评估来阻碍它. 团队任务的相互依赖缓解了这些影响,突出了复杂的团队动态.
科学领域:
- 组织心理学 组织心理学
- 团队动力学 团队动力学
- 职业健康心理学 职业健康心理学
背景情况:
- 从过程的角度来看,对团队弹性机制的理解有限.
- 现有的研究侧重于基于资源的观点,忽视了新兴的过程.
- 需要探索工作不安全如何影响团队的弹性.
研究的目的:
- 研究团队压力评估 (挑战和障碍) 在团队工作不安全性和团队弹性之间的关系中的调解作用.
- 检查团队任务相互依赖对这些途径的调节效应.
- 推进团队恢复能力的过程视角.
主要方法:
- 三波调查问卷调查.
- 数据收集来自96个团队的464名员工.
- 使用调解和调节模型进行统计分析.
主要成果:
- 团队工作的不安全性积极预测了团队挑战评估,这积极预测了团队的弹性.
- 团队工作不安全性积极预测了团队障碍评估,这预测了团队性.
- 团队任务的相互依赖加强了通过挑战评估的积极间接影响,并通过障碍评估削弱了通过障碍评估的负面间接影响.
结论:
- 团队工作的不安全性通过不同的评估途径影响团队的弹性.
- 团队任务的相互依赖起到了关键的调节作用,改变了工作不安全对性的影响.
- 结果提供了对团队弹性过程的理论见解,以及对管理工作不安全的实际影响.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
38.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.9K
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
201
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
201
Self-Serving Bias
197
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
197
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
487
Personality types, particularly Type A and Type B, significantly influence how individuals respond to stress. These personality distinctions are marked by varying levels of ambition, competitiveness, and coping styles, all of which shape an individual's resilience to stressors.
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as...
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as...
487
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
413
Coping strategies are methods people use to manage, tolerate, or reduce the effects of stressors. These strategies involve both behavioral and psychological actions to handle stressful situations. One common approach is problem-focused coping, which aims to change or eliminate the source of stress rather than merely addressing its consequences. This method involves taking direct action to resolve the issue causing stress.
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
413
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.9K


