Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

15.4K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
15.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Use of Prokinetic Agents in Adult ICU Patients: An International Inception Cohort Study (PATIENCE).

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

Potential time-sensitive biomarkers for the detection of acute mesenteric ischaemia: a systematic review of animal data.

Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals·2026
Same author

Direct and mediated effects (DME) SLCMA: a novel method for life course modelling with time-varying covariates.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Time course of energy expenditure in persistent critical illness: a prospective multicentre study.

Critical care (London, England)·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

The Glasgow Coma Scale as a predictor of mortality in intensive care: relevance of underlying cause of impaired consciousness.

Journal of critical care·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K

序列性器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) - 2评分的发展背后的逻辑和方法方法:一个共识声明.

Rui Moreno1,2,3, Andrew Rhodes4, Otavio Ranzani5,6,7

  • 1Hospital de São José, ULS de São José, Lisboa, Portugal.

JAMA network open
|October 29, 2025
PubMed
概括

修订后的顺序性器官衰竭评估 (SOFA-2) 评分更新了严重疾病成年人的器官功能障碍定义. 这一新得分反映了当前的做法,并改善了对患者结果的评估.

更多相关视频

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

20.7K
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

16.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

20.7K
SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
11:05

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

16.6K

科学领域:

  • 关键护理医学 关键护理医学
  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 临床评估 临床评估

背景情况:

  • 1996年发布的最初的顺序性器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分需要修订,因为在三十年内,器官支持和患者结果的重大进展.
  • 当前的临床实践和对器官功能障碍的理解不断发展,需要更新的评估工具.

研究的目的:

  • 制定有关器官功能障碍的最新定义,反映当前医学知识.
  • 确定修订SOFA评分 (SOFA-2) 的关键变量,以量化个体器官功能障碍的严重程度.

主要方法:

  • 一个由60名国际专家组成的重症监护和流行病学工作组使用了Delphi流程和数据合成,包括系统审查和元分析.
  • 定义了变量,从0到4进行分级,并使用来自不同环境的大型数据集 (334万患者) 测试了预测有效性.
  • 原来的六个器官系统保留了更新的术语 (例如,大脑,脏,静血,肝脏),并对器官支持变量进行了修订.

主要成果:

  • SOFA-2评分保留了原来的SOFA的生理变量,但包含了对器官系统的更新定义和术语.
  • 对器官支持变量的修订反映了当前的临床实践,并为低资源环境或治疗限制添加了替代变量.
  • 验证练习证实了SOFA-2得分在不同患者群体中的分布和预测有效性 (死亡率).

结论:

  • SOFA-2评分为评估严重疾病成年患者器官功能障碍提供了最新的,可量化的标准.
  • 这一修订后的得分考虑了患者管理和结果的当代变化,提高了临床效用.
  • 开发过程在方法上是稳健的,确保在现代重症监护机构的相关性和适用性.