关于戒烟指南的质量评估:系统审查
Upendra Singh Bhadauria1,2, Akshat Sachdeva3, Harsh Priya1
1Division of Public Health Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
这次审查发现,虽然戒烟指南丰富,但其质量各不相同. 清晰度和范围等关键领域得分很高,但适用性和编辑独立性需要改进才能更好地实施.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 基于证据的医学 基于证据的医学
背景情况:
- 许多全球指南存在,以帮助卫生保健专业人员戒烟.
- 然而,对这些指导方针的质量缺乏全面的评估.
研究的目的:
- 批判性地评估现有的戒烟指南的质量.
- 确定指南制定和报告中的优点和弱点.
主要方法:
- 对主要数据库 (PubMed,Embase,Scopus,Cochrane) 和其他来源进行了系统的搜索.
- 包括20个英语指南,用于卫生和相关卫生专业人员.
- 研究和评估指南评估II (AGREE II) 工具被四名评估员用于质量评估.
主要成果:
- 在陈述清晰度 (74.4%),范围和目的 (65.2%) 和利益相关方参与 (63.8%) 方面,指南的得分一般很高.
- 需要改进的领域包括适用性 (59.2%) 和编辑独立性 (58.3%).
- 发展的严谨性也获得了中等分数 (61.8%).
结论:
- 虽然指导方针在清晰度和范围方面表现出优势,但在适用性和独立性方面存在重大差距.
- 未来的指南制定必须优先考虑基于证据的内容和各种临床环境的实际实施策略.
- 解决发现的弱点将提高戒烟干预措施的有效性.
更多相关视频
09:25Methods to Evaluate Cytotoxicity and Immunosuppression of Combustible Tobacco Product Preparations
Published on: January 10, 2015
09:50Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
Published on: February 12, 2015
相关概念视频
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
