Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.6K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

14.1K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
14.1K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.8K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.8K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Dopaminergic Drugs Modulate Resting-State EEG Microstates in Healthy Participants.

Brain topography·2026
Same author

Evaluating the quality of brainstem ROI registration using structural and diffusion MRI.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Assessment of noninvasive quantification of [<sup>18</sup>F]SynVesT-1 with simplified reference tissue model 2 in an adolescent and youth cohort.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2026
Same author

Neural Dynamics of Social Cognition: A Single-Trial Computational Analysis of Learning Under Uncertainty.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Divergent effects of ketamine and psilocybin on EEG power spectral density in a mismatch negativity paradigm.

Psychopharmacology·2025
Same author

Cortical GABAergic Neuron Dysregulation in Schizophrenia Is Age Dependent.

Biological psychiatry global open science·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.7K

澄清可靠性悖论:测量的可靠性较差会减轻群体差异.

Povilas Karvelis1, Andreea O Diaconescu1,2,3,4

  • 1Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada.

Frontiers in psychology
|October 31, 2025
PubMed
概括

测量可靠性影响认知科学研究. 测量的可靠性较低,虽然显示了群体内影响,但可以扭曲群体差异研究,影响生物标志物和临床翻译研究.

关键词:
临床翻译 临床翻译效果大小 减弱 效果大小 减弱群体差异是群体之间的差异.群体效应是群体的影响.个人差异是个人的差异.测量的可靠性测量可靠性.可靠性悖论的可靠性悖论测试-重新测试可靠性可靠性

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.7K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.4K

科学领域:

  • 认知科学 认知科学
  • 心理测量 心理测量 心理测量
  • 生物标志物研究 生物标志物研究

背景情况:

  • 认知科学面临着可靠性悖论:具有强烈集团内效应的测量通常缺乏测试-检测可靠性.
  • 这种悖论经常被低估,特别是它对群体差异研究的影响,而不仅仅是个体差异.

研究的目的:

  • 澄清测量可靠性对认知科学中群体差异研究的影响.
  • 为了证明可靠性差如何减弱观察到的群体差异,与一些错误的假设相反.

主要方法:

  • 利用数据模拟和数学推导来分析测量可靠性的影响.
  • 检查了各种组定义场景:值连续措施和外部组定义 (例如,治疗,性别).

主要成果:

  • 证明测量可靠性有系统地减轻观察到的群体差异.
  • 量化了群体之间的可靠性差异和受试者之间的差异如何进一步影响观察到的效果大小.

结论:

  • 在认知科学中,测量可靠性对于准确的群组比较至关重要.
  • 这些发现对生物标志物研究,临床转化和群体研究的政策有重大影响.