相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

权威和作者:检查医学出版物中的领导作用

Vygintas Aliukonis¹, Eugenijus Gefenas¹

¹Centre for Health Ethics, Law and History, Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE

|October 31, 2025

概括

立陶宛的学术领导角色显著改变了研究出版模式. 领导者发表更多,在更大的团队中共同撰写,并担任不同的作者职位,揭示了学术医学中的差异.

科学领域:

图书统计学图书统计学
医学学院医学学院
研究生产力研究生产力

背景情况:

学术医学面临着平衡领导责任与研究成果的挑战.
领导职位对等级学术环境中的著作实践的影响还未得到充分研究.
本研究探讨了领导角色如何影响立陶宛医学学术界的出版和合作模式.

研究的目的:

检查领导职位的医学研究人员与非领导职位的同行之间的图书统计差异.
分析正式领导角色如何影响作者顺序,出版量和合作网络.
探索与学术医学领导相关的潜在的性别差异和产出不平等.

主要方法:

对633名立陶宛医学研究人员的10年出版记录进行了图书统计分析.
在领导者和非领导者之间比较出版成果,作者顺序 (第一,中,最后) 和共同作者数量.
用于评估群体差异和研究成果不平等的统计测试和吉尼系数.

主要成果:

领导者在影响力更高的期刊上发表了更多论文 (平均为78.42与49.41),h指数也更高.
领导者明显偏爱最后的作者 (36.42%对23.57%) 和中间的作者 (52.78%对40.12%) 的位置,而不是第一作者 (10.79%对36.31%).
领导者在更大的团队中合作,表现出高的产出不平等 (Gini=0.718),并显示出基于性别的生殖率差异.

结论:

立陶宛医学学术界的领导职位显著重塑了作者实践和研究生产力.
领导者表现出不同的协作模式和作者角色,以及显著的机构和性别差异.
调查结果突出了等级权力动态对学术出版物的影响,并要求对作者信誉进行道德审查.

关键词:

学术伦理学学术伦理学作者身份作者身份文献数量计学文献数量计学文献量计学领导领导领导领导领导领导领导医学出版医学出版研究完整性研究完整性

更多相关视频

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

相关概念视频

Vaccinations

Vaccinations

Cancer

Cancer

Cancers arise due to mutations in genes involved in the regulation of cell division, which leads to unrestricted cell proliferation. Modern science and medicine have made great strides in the understanding and treatment of cancer, including eradicating cancer in some patients. However, there is still no cure for cancer. This is largely due to the fact that cancer is a large group of many diseases.

Obedience

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...

Antibiotic Selection

Antibiotic Selection

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

Hormonal Regulation

Hormonal Regulation

Hormones regulate a significant portion of digestion through activation of the neuroendocrine system. The neuroendocrine system of digestion contains many different hormones all with multiple functions that are both, directly and indirectly, involved in digestion.