Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

63.8K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
63.8K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

64.6K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
64.6K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

390
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
390
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

216
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
216
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

22.0K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
22.0K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

43.9K
Overview
43.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Probabilistic and deductive reasoning in the human brain.

NeuroImage·2023
Same author

Specificity effects in reasoning with counterintuitive and arbitrary conditionals.

Memory & cognition·2021
Same author

Editors' Review and Introduction: Levels of Explanation in Cognitive Science: From Molecules to Culture.

Topics in cognitive science·2020
Same author

Different cognitive styles can affect performance in laparoscopic surgery skill training.

Surgical endoscopy·2019
Same author

Odors Can Serve as Landmarks in Human Wayfinding.

Cognitive science·2019
Same author

How to infer possibilities: A reply to Oaksford et al. (2018).

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2019

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

831

超越点击的推理:解开条件推理中的反例和概率.

Markus Knauff1, Lupita Estefania Gazzo Castañeda2

  • 1Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394, Giessen, Germany. markus.knauff@psychol.uni-giessen.de.

Memory & cognition
|November 4, 2025
PubMed
概括

研究人员探索了人类的推理,使用开放式的反应,而不是传统的尺度. 研究结果显示,人们经常给出某些答案,在表达不确定性时偏好反例而不是概率,这种偏见被称为概率掩饰.

关键词:
扣除 扣除 扣除 扣除 扣除心理模型是一种心理模型.方法论 方法论 方法论可能性 概率 概率.推理 推理 推理 推理不确定的推理不确定的推理.

更多相关视频

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.6K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

831
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.6K
A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.1K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 人类的推理.
  • 决策 决策 决策 决策

背景情况:

  • 传统的推理实验使用固定的响应格式 (例如,尺度,多选).
  • 这些格式可能无意中影响认知推理策略并引入偏见.
  • 开放式的响应格式允许更自然地表达结论和推理过程.

研究的目的:

  • 使用开放式响应格式研究人类推理策略.
  • 识别和分类参与者提供的结论和理由类型.
  • 引入和定义"概率掩盖"的概念.

主要方法:

  • 进行了两项实验,参与者产生了书面结论.
  • 收集和分析了超过1300个自由文本回复.
  • 一个预定义的编码方案将响应分类为确定,不确定 (反例) 或不确定 (概率).

主要成果:

  • 参与者经常提供某些结论,而不是表达细微的信念.
  • 当不确定性被表达时,它更常被具体的反例所支持,而不是概率推理.
  • 该研究观察到,某些反应倾向于分级信仰.

结论:

  • 与传统方法相比,开放式响应格式揭示了不同的推理模式.
  • 确定了概率掩盖,即分级响应格式偏向概率解释.
  • 研究结果表明,目前的方法可能高估了概率推理在人类推理中的作用.