预期与现实:刻板印象和预期的否定如何影响在线劳动力市场的职位评估
Diana Tran Nhat1,2, Timm Teubner1,2
1Department of Digital Service Engineering, Institute of Technology and Management, Faculty VII, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
PloS one
|November 4, 2025
概括
在线工作平台中的性别偏见是复杂的. 刻板印象的关联,不仅仅是性别领域的合适,影响期望和评估,影响工人的机会和薪酬.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 经济学 经济学 经济学
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
背景情况:
- 声誉显著影响在线劳动力市场的就业机会和薪酬.
- 在线声誉指标中的性别偏见已被记录,但潜在的机制尚不清楚.
- 了解这些偏见对于解决经济差距至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查性别,领域和绩效如何影响员工的期望和评估.
- 测试在线劳动力市场中期望不证实理论和角色一致性理论之间的相互作用.
- 探索性别领域协会在塑造评估中的作用.
主要方法:
- 进行了一项在线实验,操纵工人的性别,领域和表现.
- 预期失证理论和角色一致性理论提供了理论框架.
- 统计分析检查了对评估的一致性和不确定性的影响.
主要成果:
- 与假设相反,性别领域一致性并没有显著改变预期或绩效差异的影响.
- 探索性发现表明,强烈的,刻板印象的性别领域关联确实影响了评估中的期望和宽容.
- 当有强大的协会存在时,一致的员工面临更高的初始期望,并在表现不佳后被评判得更宽容.
结论:
- 仅仅性别领域的一致性是不足以解释在线劳动力市场中偏见的评估.
- 以前存在的,强烈的性别领域刻板印象在形成期望和调节基于绩效的判断方面发挥着关键作用.
- 研究结果突出了性别偏见的微妙方式,受简单角色适应之外的认知关联的影响.
更多相关视频
08:27Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
7.2K
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
5.7K
相关概念视频
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
41.9K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
41.9K
Confirmation Biases
7.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.6K
Stereotype Content Model
15.3K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.3K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
94.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.9K
Halo Effect
391
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
391
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.9K
