Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.7K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The South Texas Oral Health Network Study of Practitioners' Approaches to Oral Appliance Therapy Titration for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes (PAOSA): Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Mental Well-Being Is Associated With Temporomandibular Disorder Pain Onset and Remission.

Journal of oral rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Conceptualizing an international classification of oral behaviors (ICOB): A road map and future developments.

Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice·2026
Same author

Clinical and Psychosocial Predisposing Factors Associated With Anaesthesia Failure During Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment: A National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Study.

International endodontic journal·2026
Same author

Interprofessional collaboration for the management of orofacial pain: a delphi study in the Netherlands.

BMC oral health·2026
Same author

Sleep Bruxism and Gastroesophageal Reflux. A Scoping Review.

Nature and science of sleep·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.0K

布鲁克斯屏幕的可靠性,构造有效性,可接受性和可行性.

Laurence J Kessler1, Merel C Verhoeff1, Tess Chin1

  • 1Department of Orofacial Pain and Dysfunction, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Journal of oral rehabilitation
|November 5, 2025
PubMed
概括

布鲁克斯屏幕工具在评估布鲁克斯症方面显示出良好的可靠性和有效性. 然而,自我报告的 Bruxism (BruxScreen-Q) 与临床评估 (BruxScreen-C) 不一致.

关键词:
布鲁克斯主义是什么意思数据的准确性数据的准确性群众选 群众选 群众选 群众选结果的可复制性 结果的可复制性自我报告自我报告调查和问卷调查和问卷调查.

更多相关视频

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.7K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.0K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.7K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.2K

科学领域:

  • 牙科诊断 牙科诊断 牙科诊断
  • 口腔健康评估口腔健康评估
  • 布鲁克斯主义研究研究

背景情况:

  • 布鲁克斯症评估工具对于诊断至关重要.
  • BruxScreen,包括 BruxScreen-Q (问卷) 和 BruxScreen-C (临床评估),是一个新的工具.
  • 评估它的心理测量特性和一致性是必不可少的.

研究的目的:

  • 评估BruxScreen-Q和BruxScreen-C在评审者内部和评审者之间的可靠性.
  • 评估布鲁克斯屏幕的构造有效性,可接受性和可行性.
  • 为了确定自我报告和临床评估的 Bruxism 之间的一致性.

主要方法:

  • 88名牙科学生两次完成了BruxScreen-Q,并参加了BruxScreen-C评估.
  • 评估者内部可靠性是使用科恩的卡帕和ICC进行评估的.
  • 使用相关性和假设测试来测试构造有效性;可接受性和可行性被描述性地评估.

主要成果:

  • BruxScreen-Q 显示出相当可观的可靠性.
  • BruxScreen-C显示出可变的,但往往是优秀的,在评审者内部和评审者之间可靠性.
  • BruxScreen-Q具有中度的构造有效性,并且这两种组件都被认为是可以接受和可行的;然而,在自我报告和临床诊断的 Bruxism 之间没有发现任何一致性.

结论:

  • 布鲁克斯屏幕工具表现出可接受的可靠性,有效性,可行性和布鲁克斯症评估的可接受性.
  • 在基于主体的 Bruxism (BruxScreen-Q) 和基于临床医生的 Bruxism (BruxScreen-C) 之间存在显著的差异.
  • 需要进一步的研究来理解和调和布鲁克斯症评估中的这种不一致性.