"有预防许可":对马尔科姆·埃文斯关于预防酷刑的书的思考
1Professor emeritus, University of Oslo, Norway.
概括
禁止酷刑公约的任择议定书通过国家预防机制 (NPM) 加强了防止酷刑的措施. 马尔科姆·D·埃文斯 (Malcolm D. Evans) 的"2023年"一书为这项至关重要的人权工作提供了重要的实用指南.
科学领域:
- 人权法 人权法 人权法
- 国际法 国际法 国际法
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
背景情况:
- 禁止酷刑公约 (OPCAT) 的任择议定书于2002年通过,目的是防止酷刑和虐待.
- 自从它通过以来,大量的出版物已经出现,为防止酷刑提供了法律和实际框架.
- 关键资源包括人权高专办关于国家预防机制 (NPM) 的实用指南,卡弗和汉德利的"预防酷刑有效吗? ",以及防止酷刑小组委员会 (SPT) 和欧洲预防酷刑委员会 (CPT) 的报告.
研究的目的:
- 强调"应对酷刑"的重要性. 预防在实践中" (2023) 作为一个全面的资源.
- 为各个参与预防酷刑的利益相关者强调这项工作的必要性.
- 强调法律和系统框架的实际应用,以防止酷刑.
主要方法:
- 审查关于预防酷刑领域的重要出版物和资源.
- 分析国家预防机制 (NPM) 的作用和功能.
- 检查监测和预防酷刑的实际和法律框架.
主要成果:
- 通过OPCAT促进了预防酷刑的基本资源的开发.
- "对抗酷刑. 这是一次酷刑. 马尔科姆·D·埃文斯 (Malcolm D. Evans) 的"预防在实践中"被认为是一个至关重要的,必备的资源.
- 现有的文献为有效预防酷刑提供了强有力的法律和实际指导.
结论:
- "对抗酷刑. 这是一次酷刑. 预防在实践中"对于任何参与预防酷刑的人来说都是不可或缺的资源.
- 有效预防酷刑需要国家和国际监督机构,法律和卫生专业人员以及民间社会的参与.
- 持续开发和传播实践框架对于加强系统的酷刑预防工作至关重要.
相关概念视频
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
01:08Obedience
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
01:14Torts I
Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...
Intentional...
01:13Torts II
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
01:26Torts III
Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.