Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

555
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
555
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

374
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
374
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.9K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.3K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.3K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

11.5K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
11.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.6K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The Pretesting Effect: Exploring the Impact of Feedback and Final Test Timing.

Journal of cognition·2025
Same author

Erring on the side of caution: Two failures to replicate the derring effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025
Same author

Unraveling the benefits of experiencing errors during learning: Definition, modulating factors, and explanatory theories.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.3K

在学习之前进行测试:探索预测效应的稳定性.

Yeray Mera1, Nataliya Dianova1, Eugenia Marin-Garcia2

  • 1Department of Basic Psychological Processes and their Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Tolosa Hiribidea, 70, Donostia-San Sebastián, 20018, Spain.

Memory & cognition
|November 6, 2025
PubMed
概括

错误学习,就像预测一样,与无错复制相比,大大提高了记忆力. 这种有效的学习策略使不同年龄组受益,尽管人们经常低估它的力量.

关键词:
编码 编码 编码 编码错误学习 错误学习进行预测试.检索实践中的检索实践测试效果 测试效果

更多相关视频

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.4K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

606

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.4K
Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

606

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 教育心理学教育心理学
  • 神经科学是一个神经科学.

背景情况:

  • 检索实践增强了学习,预先测试比重复学习更优越.
  • 错误学习策略,包括预测,是增强记忆力的强大工具.
  • 对学习有效性的元认知意识往往是不准确的.

研究的目的:

  • 调查测试顺序 (预测与测试后) 对内存的影响,与无错复制相比.
  • 为了探索老年人预测效应的稳定性.
  • 检查关于测试有效性的元认知判断.

主要方法:

  • 一系列实验比较不同条件下的记忆性能:预测,后测,复制-测试-复制和无错复制.
  • 错误类型分析以识别入侵错误.
  • 实验包括不同年龄组的参与者,包括老年人.

主要成果:

  • 前测试,后测试和复制-测试-复制条件都改善了与无错复制相比的记忆,它们之间没有显著差异.
  • 与复制相比,预测显著提高了老年人的记忆力,在各个年龄组中表现出强度.
  • 参与者一直低估了测试的学习益处,这表明了超认知缺陷.

结论:

  • 错误学习,特别是预测,是一种非常有效的增强记忆的策略.
  • 预测的好处是强大的,适用于不同的年龄组和实验设计.
  • 解决理解测试有效性的元认知差距对于优化学习策略至关重要.