发病性炎症参数和青少年异常学脊椎病的科布角度:一个病例对照研究
Gülseren Demir Karakılıç1, Esra Şahingöz Bakırcı
1Gülseren Demir Karakılıç, Yozgat Bozok University, Çapanoğlu, Mah. Cemil Çiçek Cad, Bozok University Bilal Şahin Campus, Atatürk Yolu 7. KM, 66100 Merkez, Yozgat, Turkey, gulseren.d.karakilic@bozok.edu.tr.
Croatian medical journal
|November 7, 2025
概括
早期炎症标志物,如C反应性蛋白/白蛋白比率 (CAR) 和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率 (NLR) 与青少年异常学脊椎病 (AIS) 的严重程度有关. 这些标记可能有助于AIS诊断.
科学领域:
- 整形外科 整形外科 整形外科
- 炎症研究 炎症研究
- 生物标志物发现发现
背景情况:
- 青少年异常学脊椎病 (AIS) 是一种复杂的脊椎形.
- 早期发现和评估AIS严重程度对于有效管理至关重要.
- 炎症标志物越来越多地被认为是它们在各种疾病中的作用.
研究的目的:
- 研究早期炎症标志物 (NLR,MLR,PLR,CAR) 与AIS中的科布角之间的关联.
- 确定这些标记能否预测或与AIS严重程度相关.
主要方法:
- 一项多中心病例控制研究,涉及419名AIS患者和381名对照.
- 在诊断时收集人口统计数据,曲线特征和实验室参数 (WBC,NLR,MLR,PLR,CAR).
- 盲目放射科医生的科布角测量.
主要成果:
- 与对照组相比,AIS患者的白血球,中性细胞,淋巴细胞,单细胞计数,CRP,NLR和CAR数量较高.
- 在AIS患者中,CAR和NLR值与Cobb角的增加呈正相关性.
- 在AIS患者中,血小板计数和PLR较低.
结论:
- 在AIS中,C-反应蛋白/白蛋白比率 (CAR) 与科布角度显著相关,与NLR和MLR一起.
- CAR和NLR是廉价的,易于获得的标记物,可以帮助诊断AIS.
- 需要进一步的前性研究来确认CAR和NLR在AIS风险分层和监测中的作用.
更多相关视频
12:25C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position
Published on: September 16, 2022
4.5K
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
1.1K
相关概念视频
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading
451
Unsymmetrical bending occurs when the bending moment applied to a structural member does not align with its principal axis. This misalignment leads to complex stress distributions and deflection patterns that differ from symmetrical bending, which are essential for designing structures to withstand different loading conditions.
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
451
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.2K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.2K
