黑人中年妇女的日常歧视频率,交叉归因和C-反应蛋白,她们经历过歧视的歧视
Vanessa V Volpe1, Sasha C Mejía-Bradford2, Abbey N Collins1
1Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7650, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7650, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Psychoneuroendocrinology
|November 7, 2025
概括
歧视频率对黑人女性的炎症没有影响. 然而,仅基于性别而非种族的歧视与较高的C反应蛋白 (CRP) 水平有关,这表明潜在的健康风险.
科学领域:
- 社会流行病学 社会流行病学
- 心理社会压力因素 心理社会压力因素
- 炎症生物标志物 炎症生物标志物
背景情况:
- 歧视是一种慢性压力,可以增加炎症.
- 这种慢性炎症与心血管疾病和肥胖等健康问题有关.
- 黑人妇女在种族主义和性别歧视的交叉点上面临不成比例的歧视.
研究的目的:
- 检查黑人中年妇女中歧视频率和与C反应性蛋白 (CRP) 水平相关的关系.
- 了解如何将歧视归因于单一的种族,单一的性别,或两者的交叉影响炎症.
- 探索歧视对中年期健康风险的作用,中年期是心脏代谢疾病的关键时期.
主要方法:
- 全国妇女健康研究的横截面数据 (n=209名黑人中年女性).
- 使用底特律地区研究的日常歧视量表来评估歧视频率和归因 (单个种族,单个性别,交叉).
- 从血液样本中测量C-反应蛋白 (CRP) 水平,并使用线性回归分析.
主要成果:
- 歧视频率与CRP水平没有显著关联 (p=.424).
- 在单个种族和交叉划分之间,CRP水平没有显著差异.
- 仅以性别归因歧视的黑人女性的CRP水平高于交叉归因的黑人女性 (β=.14,p=.038).
结论:
- 仅仅将歧视归因于性别,而不考虑种族,可能会通过慢性炎症提高黑人中年女性的健康风险.
- 暴露于歧视的频率可能不那么重要,而不是所做的具体归因.
- 需要进一步研究跨界歧视归因的细微差别,而不仅仅是暴露频率.
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
94.8K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
94.8K
Stereotype Content Model
15.3K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.3K
Relationship Formation
45.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
45.2K
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
222
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
222
Surveys
16.6K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
16.6K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
1.2K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
1.2K


