测试人工智能聊天机器人:在基底细胞癌的背景下对大型语言模型性能进行比较分析
Vinzent K Ortner1,2, Heather C Lent3, Katrine E Karmisholt1,4
1Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Experimental dermatology
|November 11, 2025
概括
与Gemini和Copilot相比,ChatGPT 4.0在指导基底细胞癌治疗方面表现出卓越的事实准确性和临床实用性. 皮肤科医生评估对于评估皮肤瘤学中的大型语言模型至关重要.
科学领域:
- 皮肤瘤学 皮肤瘤学
- 人工智能在医学中的应用
- 临床决策支持系统 临床决策支持系统
背景情况:
- 大型语言模型 (LLM) 越来越多地被用于瘤学的应用.
- 在指导特定皮肤癌,如基底细胞癌 (BCC) 的临床管理LLMs的实用性需要严格的评估.
- 评估LLM绩效需要对不同模型进行比较和专家的人类判断.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较不同大型语言模型 (LLM) 在为基底细胞癌 (BCC) 治疗提供指导的性能.
- 根据事实准确性,简洁性,全面性和专家偏好来评估LLM响应.
- 量化评估LLM答案之间的词汇和语义相似性.
主要方法:
- 四位作者为基底细胞癌 (BCC) 提出了24个临床管理问题.
- 来自三个LLM (Gemini,Copilot,ChatGPT 4.0) 的答案是盲目的,并由九名皮肤瘤学家对准确性,简洁性,全面性和偏好进行评估.
- 使用词汇和语义相似度指标对另外三个LLM进行了LLM响应的定量比较 (ChatGPT 3.5,ChatGPT 4o,Claude).
主要成果:
- 聊天GPT 4.0 显示了最高的事实准确度 (87.5%),其次是双子座 (50%) 和 Copilot (25%).
- 聊天GPT 4.0还在简洁性 (54.2%) 和全面性 (62.5%) 中领先,其他模型得分明显低.
- 皮肤瘤学家在54.2%的病例中更喜欢ChatGPT 4.0响应;语义相似性中等 (0.60-0.70),而词汇相似性低 (0.07-0.10).
结论:
- 目前,ChatGPT 4.0在基底细胞癌 (BCC) 治疗指南的准确性和临床实用性方面优于Gemini和Copilot.
- 在专家皮肤瘤学建议有限的情况下,LLM显示出支持临床医生的潜力.
- 单纯的定量指标是不够的;专家皮肤科医生评估对于确定临床相关的LLM绩效至关重要.
相关概念视频
Skin Cancer
5.7K
Skin cancer is a type of cancer that occurs when there is an abnormal growth of skin cells, usually triggered by damage to the DNA within the skin cells. It is primarily caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun or artificial sources like tanning beds. Skin cancer is the most common type of cancer worldwide, and its incidence continues to rise.
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
5.7K
Cancer Survival Analysis
634
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
634


