Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.4K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.4K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

3.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
3.5K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population01:14

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

425
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...
425
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.0K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.0K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

542
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
542
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Fuzzy k-anonymity in complex networks.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Ecological legacies of pre-Columbian settlements evident in palm clusters of neotropical mountain forests.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Early warning signals for predicting cryptomarket vendor success using dark net forum networks.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

The effect of distant connections on node anonymity in complex networks.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Author Correction: The anatomy of a population-scale social network.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

The anatomy of a population-scale social network.

Scientific reports·2023

相关实验视频

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
07:54

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

19.1K

在社区检测中衡量群体公平性

Elze de Vink1, Frank W Takes1, Akrati Saxena1

  • 1Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

PloS one
|November 11, 2025
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

本研究为社区检测算法引入了新的群体公平性指标,解决了网络中影响少数群体的不平等问题. Infomap和Significance方法在各种网络中显示出强大的性能和公平性.

更多相关视频

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.8K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
07:54

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

19.1K
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.8K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.7K

科学领域:

  • 网络分析 网络分析
  • 算法的公平性算法公平性
  • 社会技术系统 社会技术系统

背景情况:

  • 社区结构是网络分析的基础,并由种族和性别等社会因素塑造.
  • 现实世界的网络表现出结构上的不平等,有多数和少数群体.
  • 传统的社区检测算法可能会为代表性不足的群体产生不公平的结果.

研究的目的:

  • 为评估社区检测方法提出新的群体公平度指标.
  • 进行对常见社区检测算法的性能和公平性进行比较分析.
  • 调查社区检测中的绩效和公平性之间的权衡.

主要方法:

  • 开发适用于社区检测的新群体公平度指标.
  • 在合成 (LFR,ABCD,HICH-BA) 和现实世界的网络上对社区检测算法的比较评估.
  • 在不同的算法方法中分析性能-公平性权衡.

主要成果:

  • 公平性-绩效的权衡在社区检测方法之间有很大的差异.
  • 没有一种单一的方法可以始终优化性能和公平性.
  • Infomap和Significance方法在各种社区类型和网络中显示出高性能和公平性.

结论:

  • 现有的社区检测方法表现出各种公平性表现特征.
  • 拟议的指标为评估和改进算法公平性提供了一个框架.
  • 洞察力引导设计更公平,更有效的社区检测算法,用于现实世界的网络.